Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 126 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Mcneill Ann Marie's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Mcneill Ann Marie hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Mcneill Ann Marie’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcneill Ann Marie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:33 | 08:27 to 05:54 | 66.2% |
| Run Total | 00:40 | 46:56 to 46:16 | 17.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:35 | 06:32 to 05:57 | 15.2% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:22 to 05:19 | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:54 to 03:54 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:54 to 05:54 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 03:04 to 03:04 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:17 to 07:17 | 0.0% |
| Mcneill Ann Marie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:41 | 00:00 | 05:02 +01:39 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:53 | 06:41 | 04:58 -00:05 | 05:02 +01:39 |
| Running 2 | 05:06 | 11:34 | 05:28 -00:22 | 10:00 +01:34 |
| Sled Push | 03:54 | 16:40 | 04:49 -00:55 | 15:28 +01:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 20:34 | 06:02 -00:47 | 20:17 +00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 05:54 | 25:49 | 07:47 -01:53 | 26:19 -00:30 |
| Running 4 | 05:20 | 31:43 | 05:55 -00:35 | 34:06 -02:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:32 | 37:03 | 06:00 +00:32 | 40:01 -02:58 |
| Running 5 | 07:48 | 43:35 | 06:15 +01:33 | 46:01 -02:26 |
| Rowing | 05:22 | 51:23 | 05:20 +00:02 | 52:16 -00:53 |
| Running 6 | 05:32 | 56:45 | 05:59 -00:27 | 57:36 -00:51 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:04 | 01:02:17 | 03:10 -00:06 | 01:03:35 -01:18 |
| Running 7 | 05:33 | 01:05:21 | 06:02 -00:29 | 01:06:45 -01:24 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:27 | 01:10:54 | 06:02 +02:25 | 01:12:47 -01:53 |
| Running 8 | 05:44 | 01:19:21 | 06:37 -00:53 | 01:18:49 +00:32 |
| Wall Balls | 07:17 | 01:25:05 | 07:20 -00:03 | 01:25:26 -00:21 |
| Roxzone | 07:46 | 01:40:00 | 07:14 +00:32 | 01:40:00 |
Ann Marie Mcneill's performance in the 2024 Madrid Hyrox race was commendable. Her overall rank was in the top 19% of 252 athletes, and she ranked second in her age group. Her total running time was 46:56, which was 46 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong running profile. This suggests that Ann Marie has superior running skills and endurance, which she can leverage to her advantage. Her best running lap was 5:06 - a noteworthy accomplishment.
Despite a slower start in Running 1, Ann Marie managed to pick up the pace in subsequent running segments, consistently finishing faster than the average time. This indicates a strong ability to recover and adapt, which is crucial in a race setting. It also suggests that she might benefit from a warmer start to better prepare her body for the initial intensity of the race.
The Roxzone time, which measures the time spent transitioning between exercise zones, was slower than average. This suggests that there may be room for improvement in both overall fitness and transition efficiency.
Given her strong running profile, Ann Marie should aim to maximize her speed in the running segments to make up for any time lost in the strength segments. She should also consider starting the race at a slightly faster pace to avoid losing too much time in the initial stage.
During the strength segments, focusing on maintaining good form can help prevent fatigue and ensure efficient energy use. Finally, practicing transitions between exercises can help reduce the roxzone time, leading to an overall faster finish.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Woods Alexandra | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:39:46 | |
| Fitzner Stefanie | 2023 Hamburg | 01:39:31 | |
| Mccann Christine | 2024 Dublin | 01:40:19 | |
| Valencia Lara Valeria | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:40:11 | |
| Rehm Hanna | 2022 München | 01:40:30 | |
| Pasdzior Beate | 2022 Essen | 01:40:12 | |
| Steinemann Angela | 2023 München | 01:39:43 | |
| Muskus Johanna | 2024 World Championships Nice | 01:39:40 | |
| Hislop Laura | 2023 Birmingham | 01:40:26 | |
| Meeds Charlotte | 2024 London | 01:39:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:28:32 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
