Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 94 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Halliday Graham's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Halliday Graham's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Halliday Graham's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Halliday Graham's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:50. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:22 | 03:27 to 02:05 | 74.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:11 | 03:17 to 03:06 | 10.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:08 | 02:35 to 02:27 | 7.3% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 04:05 to 03:58 | 6.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 03:46 to 03:44 | 1.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:24 to 03:24 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:25 to 01:25 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:36 to 03:36 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 29:19 to 29:19 | 0.0% |
| Halliday Graham | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:04 | 00:00 | 03:22 +00:42 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:46 | 04:04 | 03:48 -00:02 | 03:22 +00:42 |
| Running 2 | 03:18 | 07:50 | 03:34 -00:16 | 07:10 +00:40 |
| Sled Push | 03:27 | 11:08 | 02:29 +00:58 | 10:44 +00:24 |
| Running 3 | 03:27 | 14:35 | 03:44 -00:17 | 13:13 +01:22 |
| Sled Pull | 03:24 | 18:02 | 03:38 -00:14 | 16:57 +01:05 |
| Running 4 | 03:35 | 21:26 | 03:46 -00:11 | 20:35 +00:51 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:35 | 25:01 | 02:41 -00:06 | 24:21 +00:40 |
| Running 5 | 03:39 | 27:36 | 03:49 -00:10 | 27:02 +00:34 |
| Rowing | 04:05 | 31:15 | 03:59 +00:06 | 30:51 +00:24 |
| Running 6 | 03:38 | 35:20 | 03:47 -00:09 | 34:50 +00:30 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:25 | 38:58 | 01:31 -00:06 | 38:37 +00:21 |
| Running 7 | 03:46 | 40:23 | 03:49 -00:03 | 40:08 +00:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:17 | 44:09 | 03:11 +00:06 | 43:57 +00:12 |
| Running 8 | 03:56 | 47:26 | 04:02 -00:06 | 47:08 +00:18 |
| Wall Balls | 03:36 | 51:22 | 04:17 -00:41 | 51:10 +00:12 |
| Roxzone | 04:25 | 59:14 | 03:47 +00:38 | 59:14 |
Graham Halliday's performance at the 2024 Madrid Hyrox race was exceptional, setting him apart in the top 0% of 252 athletes. His overall race time was 00:59:14, a testament to his impressive physical abilities. He particularly excelled in his running segments, with a 'Total running time' of 00:29:19, which was 00:43 faster than the average time. This performance indicates that Graham is more of a runner than a strength athlete. However, his performance during the first running segment was slower than average, suggesting he may have started the race at a slower pace before ramping up speed in subsequent segments.
To improve his race performance, Graham should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Czapla Jannik | 2023 Hannover | 59:05 | |
| Wenisch Tim | 2024 Birmingham | 59:44 | |
| Enthoven Maarten | 2024 Frankfurt | 59:28 | |
| Kent Ryan | 2019 New York | 59:14 | |
| Patiño Vieites Rubén | 2023 Hannover | 59:04 | |
| Mrabet Mohamed Ali | 2024 Dubai | 58:58 | |
| Kienle Sebastian | 2024 Berlin | 59:05 | |
| Molzahn Dominic | 2022 Maastricht | 59:16 | |
| Wenisch Tim | 2022 London | 59:02 | |
| Wynn Jonathon | 2022 Frankfurt | 58:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Glasgow | 57:53 | |
| 2023 Manchester | 01:02:07 | |
| 2023 Hannover | 57:35 | |
| 2024 Manchester | 58:42 | |
| 2023 Warschau | 01:04:11 | |
| 2024 Washington - North American Championships | 58:08 | |
| 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 58:16 | |
| 2023 World Championships Manchester | 58:41 | |
| 2022 Valencia | 01:02:54 | |
| 2023 Stockholm | 58:45 | |
| 2023 Chicago | 01:01:23 | |
| 2022 London | 01:12:18 | |
| 2022 Manchester | 01:09:56 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
