Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Walker Anthony's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Walker Anthony's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Walker Anthony's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Walker Anthony's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:24 | 06:56 to 05:32 | 34.6% |
| Run Total | 00:49 | 44:43 to 43:54 | 20.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:40 | 05:42 to 05:02 | 16.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:27 | 05:42 to 05:15 | 11.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:26 | 02:38 to 02:12 | 10.7% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 05:09 to 04:52 | 7.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:17 to 04:17 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:20 to 02:20 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:10 to 06:10 | 0.0% |
| Walker Anthony | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:40 | 00:00 | 04:46 -00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:17 | 04:40 | 04:31 -00:14 | 04:46 -00:06 |
| Running 2 | 04:52 | 08:57 | 05:11 -00:19 | 09:17 -00:20 |
| Sled Push | 02:20 | 13:49 | 03:04 -00:44 | 14:28 -00:39 |
| Running 3 | 05:06 | 16:09 | 05:40 -00:34 | 17:32 -01:23 |
| Sled Pull | 05:42 | 21:15 | 05:17 +00:25 | 23:12 -01:57 |
| Running 4 | 05:33 | 26:57 | 05:38 -00:05 | 28:29 -01:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:56 | 32:30 | 05:49 +01:07 | 34:07 -01:37 |
| Running 5 | 06:08 | 39:26 | 05:51 +00:17 | 39:56 -00:30 |
| Rowing | 05:09 | 45:34 | 04:56 +00:13 | 45:47 -00:13 |
| Running 6 | 06:00 | 50:43 | 05:41 +00:19 | 50:43 +00:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:38 | 56:43 | 02:18 +00:20 | 56:24 +00:19 |
| Running 7 | 06:02 | 59:21 | 05:39 +00:23 | 58:42 +00:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:42 | 01:05:23 | 05:31 +00:11 | 01:04:21 +01:02 |
| Running 8 | 06:26 | 01:11:05 | 06:23 +00:03 | 01:09:52 +01:13 |
| Wall Balls | 06:10 | 01:17:31 | 07:04 -00:54 | 01:16:15 +01:16 |
| Roxzone | 07:21 | 01:30:53 | 07:34 -00:13 | 01:30:53 |
Anthony Walker showcased a commendable performance in the HYROX Melbourne event, ranking in the top 39% overall and the top 33% within his age group. His total running time of 44:43 was notably 31 seconds faster than the average, indicating a strong running capability. However, his performance across strength-based exercises demonstrated room for improvement. Anthony's pacing strategy seemed balanced, starting slightly faster in the initial running segments but maintaining a consistent speed throughout, suggesting he managed his energy well. Overall, he exhibits a hybrid profile, with a slight edge in running compared to strength exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Welters Nick | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:31:16 | |
| Klein Samuel | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:30:51 | |
| Forder Daniel | 2024 Manchester | 01:30:31 | |
| Colarossi Arsene | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:30:28 | |
| Pollock William | 2024 Glasgow | 01:30:33 | |
| Wood Bryce | 2021 Chicago | 01:31:13 | |
| Szpala Benjamin | 2024 Marseille | 01:31:20 | |
| Grigoratos Byron | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:30:59 | |
| Schoeman Nicholas Heinrich | 2024 Beijing | 01:30:29 | |
| Peich Philipp | 2020 Hannover | 01:31:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Melbourne | 01:34:00 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
