Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Frankfurt using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Schreiber Lars's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Schreiber Lars's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Schreiber Lars's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Schreiber Lars's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:43. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:21 | 39:39 to 38:18 | 36.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:00 | 05:14 to 04:14 | 26.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:56 | 06:10 to 05:14 | 25.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:23 | 02:45 to 02:22 | 10.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:03 | 04:17 to 04:14 | 1.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:27 to 03:27 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:35 to 01:35 | 0.0% |
| Schreiber Lars | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:15 | 00:00 | 04:19 -00:04 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 04:15 | 04:20 -00:07 | 04:19 -00:04 |
| Running 2 | 04:40 | 08:28 | 04:38 +00:02 | 08:39 -00:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:45 | 13:08 | 02:40 +00:05 | 13:17 -00:09 |
| Running 3 | 04:53 | 15:53 | 05:01 -00:08 | 15:57 -00:04 |
| Sled Pull | 03:27 | 20:46 | 04:27 -01:00 | 20:58 -00:12 |
| Running 4 | 05:00 | 24:13 | 05:00 +00:00 | 25:25 -01:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:14 | 29:13 | 04:40 +00:34 | 30:25 -01:12 |
| Running 5 | 04:59 | 34:27 | 05:09 -00:10 | 35:05 -00:38 |
| Rowing | 04:15 | 39:26 | 04:39 -00:24 | 40:14 -00:48 |
| Running 6 | 05:03 | 43:41 | 05:02 +00:01 | 44:53 -01:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:35 | 48:44 | 02:01 -00:26 | 49:55 -01:11 |
| Running 7 | 04:59 | 50:19 | 05:01 -00:02 | 51:56 -01:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:17 | 55:18 | 04:35 -00:18 | 56:57 -01:39 |
| Running 8 | 05:53 | 59:35 | 05:27 +00:26 | 01:01:32 -01:57 |
| Wall Balls | 06:10 | 01:05:28 | 05:46 +00:24 | 01:06:59 -01:31 |
| Roxzone | 07:08 | 01:18:40 | 05:55 +01:13 | 01:18:40 |
When analyzing his splits, Lars showed consistent performance throughout the race, with some areas of strength and others that could use improvement. His total running time was 00:39:39, which was 00:58 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that Lars may benefit from focusing on improving his running fitness. However, it is worth noting that his best running lap was 00:04:15, indicating that he has the potential to excel in running if given the right training.
Overall, Lars Schreiber had a commendable performance in the 2022 Frankfurt HYROX race. By focusing on improving his running fitness, reducing transition time, and targeting specific segments for improvement, Lars can continue to enhance his performance in future races. Incorporating the suggested training strategies, exercises, drills, and race strategies can help Lars reach his full potential as a fitness athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Roge Pascal | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:56 | |
| Wilson Aaron | 2024 Melbourne | 01:18:57 | |
| Noakes David | 2024 Madrid | 01:18:32 | |
| Manning Rupert | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:29 | |
| Cleary David | 2024 Melbourne | 01:18:55 | |
| Doel Adam | 2024 London | 01:18:30 | |
| Lopez Herb | 2024 Dallas | 01:18:37 | |
| Chaney Ben | 2022 Basel | 01:18:33 | |
| Kowalczyk Markus | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:18:41 | |
| Walker Vincent | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:18:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Stuttgart | 01:12:46 | |
| 2024 Köln | 01:09:30 | |
| 2023 Frankfurt | 01:15:23 | |
| 2024 Frankfurt | — | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
