Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Santos Adrian's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Santos Adrian's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Santos Adrian's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Santos Adrian's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:00 | 50:31 to 46:31 | 79.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:48 | 04:02 to 03:14 | 15.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:14 | 07:38 to 07:24 | 4.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:50 to 04:50 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:22 to 02:22 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Santos Adrian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:51 | 00:00 | 05:00 +00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 05:51 | 04:38 -00:10 | 05:00 +00:51 |
| Running 2 | 05:53 | 10:19 | 05:27 +00:26 | 09:38 +00:41 |
| Sled Push | 04:02 | 16:12 | 03:18 +00:44 | 15:05 +01:07 |
| Running 3 | 06:15 | 20:14 | 05:58 +00:17 | 18:23 +01:51 |
| Sled Pull | 04:59 | 26:29 | 05:40 -00:41 | 24:21 +02:08 |
| Running 4 | 06:26 | 31:28 | 05:57 +00:29 | 30:01 +01:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:50 | 37:54 | 06:24 -01:34 | 35:58 +01:56 |
| Running 5 | 06:46 | 42:44 | 06:12 +00:34 | 42:22 +00:22 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 49:30 | 05:04 -00:14 | 48:34 +00:56 |
| Running 6 | 06:14 | 54:20 | 06:01 +00:13 | 53:38 +00:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:22 | 01:00:34 | 02:27 -00:05 | 59:39 +00:55 |
| Running 7 | 06:11 | 01:02:56 | 06:01 +00:10 | 01:02:06 +00:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:09 | 01:09:07 | 05:59 -01:50 | 01:08:07 +01:00 |
| Running 8 | 07:00 | 01:13:16 | 06:58 +00:02 | 01:14:06 -00:50 |
| Wall Balls | 07:38 | 01:20:16 | 07:49 -00:11 | 01:21:04 -00:48 |
| Roxzone | 09:26 | 01:37:09 | 08:16 +01:10 | 01:37:09 |
Based on the splits analysis, it is evident that Adrian struggled in several running segments, including Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, and Running 7. These segments accounted for the majority of the time lost during the race. Additionally, the Roxzone time was slower than average, indicating that Adrian may have taken longer rests or transitions between exercises.
In conclusion, Adrian Santos had a solid performance in the 2022 Birmingham HYROX race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his performance in future races. By focusing on improving his running endurance and speed, reducing transition times, and implementing race strategies, Adrian can work towards achieving better results in upcoming competitions.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gallo Snchez Alberto | 2023 Bilbao | 01:37:24 | |
| Grimes Christopher | 2024 Dublin | 01:37:09 | |
| Wijnands Thijs | 2024 Maastricht | 01:36:48 | |
| Sturmhoebel Jan | 2022 Bremen | 01:37:05 | |
| Athanassoglou Vass | 2022 London | 01:36:46 | |
| Söderman Kenneth | 2023 Stockholm | 01:37:00 | |
| Stenzel Carsten | 2022 Hamburg | 01:36:55 | |
| Vlooswijk Victor | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:36:52 | |
| Carroll Shane | 2023 Paris | 01:37:17 | |
| Nico Robin | 2019 Karlsruhe | 01:36:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:35:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
