Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 153 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Orbison Eric's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Orbison Eric's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Orbison Eric's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Orbison Eric's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 12:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 09:40 | 01:07:01 to 57:21 | 76.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:59 | 05:24 to 04:25 | 7.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:47 | 08:15 to 07:28 | 6.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:40 | 03:51 to 03:11 | 5.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:33 | 08:30 to 07:57 | 4.3% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 05:38 to 05:36 | 0.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:02 to 05:02 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 08:35 to 08:35 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:56 to 06:56 | 0.0% |
| Orbison Eric | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:21 | 00:00 | 06:06 +00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:02 | 06:21 | 04:59 +00:03 | 06:06 +00:15 |
| Running 2 | 06:25 | 11:23 | 06:42 -00:17 | 11:05 +00:18 |
| Sled Push | 05:24 | 17:48 | 04:17 +01:07 | 17:47 +00:01 |
| Running 3 | 08:28 | 23:12 | 07:38 +00:50 | 22:04 +01:08 |
| Sled Pull | 08:15 | 31:40 | 07:37 +00:38 | 29:42 +01:58 |
| Running 4 | 06:44 | 39:55 | 07:36 -00:52 | 37:19 +02:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:35 | 46:39 | 09:33 -00:58 | 44:55 +01:44 |
| Running 5 | 08:34 | 55:14 | 08:20 +00:14 | 54:28 +00:46 |
| Rowing | 05:38 | 01:03:48 | 05:37 +00:01 | 01:02:48 +01:00 |
| Running 6 | 08:55 | 01:09:26 | 07:47 +01:08 | 01:08:25 +01:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:51 | 01:18:21 | 03:04 +00:47 | 01:16:12 +02:09 |
| Running 7 | 10:46 | 01:22:12 | 07:56 +02:50 | 01:19:16 +02:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:30 | 01:32:58 | 09:02 -00:32 | 01:27:12 +05:46 |
| Running 8 | 10:52 | 01:41:28 | 10:50 +00:02 | 01:36:14 +05:14 |
| Wall Balls | 06:56 | 01:52:20 | 11:28 -04:32 | 01:47:04 +05:16 |
| Roxzone | 11:15 | 02:10:23 | 11:51 -00:36 | 02:10:23 |
In terms of pacing, Eric's best running lap time was 00:06:21, which was 00:33 slower than the average. He maintained a consistent pace throughout the race, with some segments being slightly faster and others slightly slower than average.
Based on the splits analysis, Eric's performance indicates that he has a balanced profile with both running and strength capabilities. However, there is room for improvement in certain areas to enhance his overall performance.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Eric Orbison can enhance his performance and achieve better results in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Siebracht ArndtEric | 2024 Hamburg | 02:10:43 | |
| Nash Graham | 2024 London | 02:10:32 | |
| Han Dongseok | 2024 Incheon | 02:10:14 | |
| Ogawa Naoya | 2024 Hong Kong | 02:10:01 | |
| Ventre Michael | 2022 London | 02:10:39 | |
| Orbison Eric | 2023 New York | 02:10:23 | |
| Oo Ye Min | 2023 Singapore | 02:10:32 | |
| Atkins Philip | 2022 London | 02:09:57 | |
| Diekmann Christian | 2018 Hamburg | 02:10:37 | |
| Mustafa Liridon | 2024 Frankfurt | 02:10:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
