Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Ciudad de Mexico using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ocampo Juan Pablo's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ocampo Juan Pablo's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ocampo Juan Pablo's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ocampo Juan Pablo's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:01 | 49:32 to 46:31 | 60.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:40 | 08:04 to 07:24 | 13.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:30 | 06:01 to 05:31 | 10.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:28 | 02:52 to 02:24 | 9.4% |
| Rowing | 00:19 | 05:20 to 05:01 | 6.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:41 to 02:41 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:25 to 05:25 | 0.0% |
| Ocampo Juan Pablo | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:29 | 00:00 | 05:00 +01:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 06:29 | 04:38 -00:06 | 05:00 +01:29 |
| Running 2 | 05:30 | 11:01 | 05:26 +00:04 | 09:38 +01:23 |
| Sled Push | 02:41 | 16:31 | 03:18 -00:37 | 15:04 +01:27 |
| Running 3 | 06:02 | 19:12 | 05:59 +00:03 | 18:22 +00:50 |
| Sled Pull | 06:01 | 25:14 | 05:39 +00:22 | 24:21 +00:53 |
| Running 4 | 05:57 | 31:15 | 05:56 +00:01 | 30:00 +01:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:01 | 37:12 | 06:24 -01:23 | 35:56 +01:16 |
| Running 5 | 05:56 | 42:13 | 06:11 -00:15 | 42:20 -00:07 |
| Rowing | 05:20 | 48:09 | 05:04 +00:16 | 48:31 -00:22 |
| Running 6 | 06:15 | 53:29 | 06:01 +00:14 | 53:35 -00:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:52 | 59:44 | 02:27 +00:25 | 59:36 +00:08 |
| Running 7 | 06:17 | 01:02:36 | 06:00 +00:17 | 01:02:03 +00:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:25 | 01:08:53 | 05:59 -00:34 | 01:08:03 +00:50 |
| Running 8 | 07:09 | 01:14:18 | 06:58 +00:11 | 01:14:02 +00:16 |
| Wall Balls | 08:04 | 01:21:27 | 07:47 +00:17 | 01:21:00 +00:27 |
| Roxzone | 07:37 | 01:37:02 | 08:15 -00:38 | 01:37:02 |
Juan Pablo Ocampo performed well within the top half of all competitors and within his age group, placing in the top 44% and 45% respectively. He demonstrated a balanced profile, showing both strength and endurance capabilities across a variety of exercises. However, his overall running time was 01:49 slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in his running endurance and speed. It can also be noted that Juan started a bit too slow on his first run segment, but managed to maintain a steady pace throughout the remaining run segments.
During the race, Juan should focus on maintaining a steady pace throughout all running segments, ensuring he doesn't start too slow. He needs to pay attention to his transitions between exercises to minimize rest time, potentially improving his performance in the Roxzone segment. He should also focus on his form during strength segments to maximize efficiency and prevent fatigue. Practicing these strategies during training can help them become second nature on race day.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rhoades James | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:37:05 | |
| Warren Bailey | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:36:40 | |
| Manjarrez Daniel | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:36:37 | |
| Denkinger Sven | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:36:47 | |
| Mushtaq Cheraz | 2023 Paris | 01:37:00 | |
| Frangeul Lucas | 2023 Paris | 01:37:17 | |
| Tervooren Joost | 2024 Köln | 01:37:30 | |
| De Val Marín Víctor | 2022 Valencia | 01:37:32 | |
| Lini Umberto | 2024 Milan | 01:37:12 | |
| Preston Lee | 2022 London | 01:37:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
