Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire O'Connor David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights O'Connor David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the O'Connor David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve O'Connor David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
06:03.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
David O'Connor finished in the top 50% overall and top 54% in his age group, showing a competitive performance in the 2024 Sydney Hyrox race. His standout strengths were in the Sled Push and Wall Balls segments, where he performed significantly better than average. However, his overall running time was slower than average by 28 seconds, indicating a need to focus on improving running efficiency. His initial running segments (Running 1 to Running 4) were strong, suggesting he might have started too fast, which could have impacted his endurance in later segments. David exhibits a hybrid profile with strong performances in specific strength exercises and moderate running capability.
Segments to Improve
Burpees Broad Jump: This segment was 2:06 slower than average, placing David in the 97th percentile. To improve:
Plyometric Training: Incorporate box jumps, squat jumps, and depth jumps to enhance explosive power and improve burpee efficiency.
Form Correction: Focus on maintaining a steady rhythm and consistent breathing to keep energy levels high throughout the exercise.
Running Total: Overall running was 28 seconds slower than average. To enhance running performance:
Interval Training: Implement short, high-intensity sprints followed by rest periods to boost speed and endurance.
Long Distance Runs: Include weekly long runs to build aerobic capacity and stamina.
Sandbag Lunges: 1:22 slower than average, in the 92nd percentile. To improve:
Strength Training: Focus on lower body strength with exercises like barbell lunges and step-ups to enhance muscle endurance.
Core Stability: Incorporate planks and Russian twists to improve balance and stability during lunges.
Sled Pull: Slightly slower than average. To turn this into a strength:
Resistance Training: Use heavier sleds in training to build pulling strength.
Technique Focus: Work on maintaining a low body position and strong grip to maximize pulling efficiency.
Ski Erg: 11 seconds slower than average, in the 77th percentile. For improvement:
Upper Body Conditioning: Include exercises like lat pulldowns and seated rows to strengthen the upper body.
Technique Refinement: Focus on a powerful and smooth stroke to improve efficiency on the ergometer.
Race Strategies
Start Steadier: Maintain a more consistent pace in the initial running segments to conserve energy for later parts of the race.
Optimize Transitions: Practice swift transitions between exercise zones to minimize downtime in the Roxzone.
Focus on Breathing: Implement rhythmic breathing strategies during high-intensity segments to maintain oxygen flow and prevent fatigue.
Efficient Pacing: Monitor heart rate and exertion levels to ensure consistent performance without overexertion in early stages.