Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Poznan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire O'Connell Luke's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights O'Connell Luke's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the O'Connell Luke's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve O'Connell Luke's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:05 | 07:02 to 05:57 | 42.8% |
| Run Total | 00:34 | 48:03 to 47:29 | 22.4% |
| Rowing | 00:27 | 05:31 to 05:04 | 17.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:26 | 02:54 to 02:28 | 17.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:37 to 05:37 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:44 to 06:44 | 0.0% |
| O'Connell Luke | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:51 | 00:00 | 05:02 +00:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 05:51 | 04:39 -00:18 | 05:02 +00:49 |
| Running 2 | 05:38 | 10:12 | 05:32 +00:06 | 09:41 +00:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:16 | 15:50 | 03:22 -01:06 | 15:13 +00:37 |
| Running 3 | 05:48 | 18:06 | 06:05 -00:17 | 18:35 -00:29 |
| Sled Pull | 04:49 | 23:54 | 05:49 -01:00 | 24:40 -00:46 |
| Running 4 | 05:55 | 28:43 | 06:03 -00:08 | 30:29 -01:46 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:37 | 34:38 | 06:36 -00:59 | 36:32 -01:54 |
| Running 5 | 06:13 | 40:15 | 06:19 -00:06 | 43:08 -02:53 |
| Rowing | 05:31 | 46:28 | 05:06 +00:25 | 49:27 -02:59 |
| Running 6 | 06:05 | 51:59 | 06:07 -00:02 | 54:33 -02:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:54 | 58:04 | 02:31 +00:23 | 01:00:40 -02:36 |
| Running 7 | 05:58 | 01:00:58 | 06:07 -00:09 | 01:03:11 -02:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:02 | 01:06:56 | 06:12 +00:50 | 01:09:18 -02:22 |
| Running 8 | 06:38 | 01:13:58 | 07:07 -00:29 | 01:15:30 -01:32 |
| Wall Balls | 06:44 | 01:20:36 | 07:53 -01:09 | 01:22:37 -02:01 |
| Roxzone | 11:48 | 01:39:00 | 08:30 +03:18 | 01:39:00 |
Luke O'Connell showed impressive performance in the 2024 Poznan HYROX Race. He managed to finish in the top 79% of the total athletes and top 80% of his age group, a noteworthy achievement. His total running time was faster than average, indicating that Luke has a strong running profile. His time for the best running lap was commendable, which further supports his running strength. However, his Roxzone time suggests that he took longer breaks between exercise zones, which affected his overall race time. In the first four running segments, Luke seems to have started slower than the average, but gradually improved his pace which is an interesting strategy to conserve energy for later segments.
Based on the analysis of his performance, Luke can incorporate the following strategies in his races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Wilson Samuel | 2023 Glasgow | 01:39:26 | |
| Cahill Ray | 2023 Rimini | 01:38:47 | |
| Verduin Sander | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:39:10 | |
| Page Danny | 2023 London | 01:39:15 | |
| Mohr Sander | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:39:17 | |
| Murphy James | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:39:23 | |
| Kelly Joseph | 2024 London | 01:38:42 | |
| Hayward Charles | 2024 New York | 01:39:19 | |
| Laycock Jon | 2022 London | 01:39:20 | |
| Ling Michael | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:39:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
