Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
1000 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
05:54.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 1000 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance
Jeffrey Noord delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, ranking in the top 27% overall and top 30% in his age group. His strengths were evident in the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Burpees Broad Jump, and Farmers Carry, where he consistently performed faster than the average. However, analysis of his running splits reveals a potential pacing issue: he started significantly faster than average in Running 1 but progressively slowed in subsequent running segments. This indicates a need to refine pacing strategy to maintain consistent speed throughout the race. Overall, Jeffrey's profile suggests a hybrid athlete with strengths in both running and strength exercises, although his overall running time was 4:05 slower than average, highlighting running as an area for improvement.
Segments to Improve
Total Running Time:
Jeffrey's total running time was slower than average, primarily due to pacing inconsistencies. To improve, he should focus on endurance and pacing in his running training.
Training Strategies:
Incorporate interval training sessions focusing on sustained pace over longer distances.
Include tempo runs to build stamina and speed consistency.
Practice negative splits in training to develop the ability to finish strong.
Sled Pull:
The Sled Pull was slightly below average. Improving technique and strength would be beneficial.
Training Strategies:
Enhance grip strength and upper body endurance through exercises like pull-ups and farmer's walks.
Practice sled pull drills with varying weights to simulate race conditions and improve technique.
Incorporate core strengthening exercises such as planks and Russian twists to stabilize and transfer energy effectively.
Wall Balls:
While slightly better than average, further improvement in Wall Balls could enhance overall performance.
Training Strategies:
Focus on squat form and explosiveness with exercises like squat jumps and box jumps.
Incorporate high-rep wall ball drills to build endurance and efficiency.
Practice maintaining a steady rhythm and breathing technique during wall ball exercises.
Race Strategies
Maintain Consistent Pacing: Start with a conservative pace and gradually build speed to avoid early fatigue.
Optimize Transitions: Focus on improving transition speed by practicing efficient movement between zones in training.
Compromised Running: Simulate race conditions by practicing runs immediately after strength exercises to adapt to compromised running scenarios.