Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kearley Trent's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kearley Trent's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kearley Trent's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kearley Trent's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:03 | 41:07 to 39:04 | 47.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:11 | 05:33 to 04:22 | 27.2% |
| Sled Pull | 01:07 | 05:19 to 04:12 | 25.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:08 to 04:08 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:45 to 01:45 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:35 to 01:35 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Kearley Trent | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:49 | 00:00 | 04:21 +00:28 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:08 | 04:49 | 04:21 -00:13 | 04:21 +00:28 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 08:57 | 04:42 +00:08 | 08:42 +00:15 |
| Sled Push | 01:45 | 13:47 | 02:42 -00:57 | 13:24 +00:23 |
| Running 3 | 05:01 | 15:32 | 05:05 -00:04 | 16:06 -00:34 |
| Sled Pull | 05:19 | 20:33 | 04:32 +00:47 | 21:11 -00:38 |
| Running 4 | 05:06 | 25:52 | 05:04 +00:02 | 25:43 +00:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:19 | 30:58 | 04:47 -00:28 | 30:47 +00:11 |
| Running 5 | 05:19 | 35:17 | 05:12 +00:07 | 35:34 -00:17 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 40:36 | 04:40 -00:06 | 40:46 -00:10 |
| Running 6 | 05:08 | 45:10 | 05:05 +00:03 | 45:26 -00:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:35 | 50:18 | 02:02 -00:27 | 50:31 -00:13 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 51:53 | 05:03 +00:12 | 52:33 -00:40 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:33 | 57:08 | 04:40 +00:53 | 57:36 -00:28 |
| Running 8 | 05:42 | 01:02:41 | 05:32 +00:10 | 01:02:16 +00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 04:28 | 01:08:23 | 05:53 -01:25 | 01:07:48 +00:35 |
| Roxzone | 07:05 | 01:19:47 | 06:06 +00:59 | 01:19:47 |
Trent Kearley finished with an overall time of 01:19:47, ranking him in the top 18% of 1801 athletes and the top 20% within his age group. His performance in strength-based exercises such as the Sled Push and Wall Balls was notably strong, indicating a solid foundation in strength training. However, his total running time was 00:44 slower than the average, suggesting a need for improvement in this area. The pacing analysis shows that Trent's initial laps were slightly slower than average, indicating he could potentially start a bit faster. Overall, Trent exhibits a balanced profile with a slight strength bias, given his exceptional performance in strength segments and room for improvement in running.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Offringa Jelmer | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:19:46 | |
| Guèye LouisMatar | 2024 Marseille | 01:19:42 | |
| Kramer Stefan | 2022 Hamburg | 01:20:01 | |
| Maurin Ludovic | 2024 Marseille | 01:19:36 | |
| Askham Will | 2023 Sydney | 01:20:04 | |
| Trombetta Umberto | 2024 Turin | 01:20:00 | |
| Cremonini Daniele | 2024 Turin | 01:20:06 | |
| El Idrissi Karame | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:19:38 | |
| Fini Salvatore Pio | 2024 Rimini | 01:19:41 | |
| Zuber Antoine | 2022 Hamburg | 01:20:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
