Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:43 (From 45:54 to 43:11) | 59.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:57 (From 05:52 to 04:55) | 20.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:48 (From 05:55 to 05:07) | 17.4% |
| Rowing | 00:07 (From 04:56 to 04:49) | 2.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 (From 04:28 to 04:27) | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:42 to 02:42) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 04:37 to 04:37) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:03 to 02:03) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 06:27 to 06:27) | 0.0% |
| Harper Justin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:39 | 00:00 | 04:46 -00:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 04:39 | 04:30 -00:02 | 04:46 -00:07 |
| Running 2 | 05:53 | 09:07 | 05:06 +00:47 | 09:16 -00:09 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 15:00 | 03:02 -00:20 | 14:22 +00:38 |
| Running 3 | 06:04 | 17:42 | 05:34 +00:30 | 17:24 +00:18 |
| Sled Pull | 05:52 | 23:46 | 05:12 +00:40 | 22:58 +00:48 |
| Running 4 | 06:04 | 29:38 | 05:33 +00:31 | 28:10 +01:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:37 | 35:42 | 05:42 -01:05 | 33:43 +01:59 |
| Running 5 | 05:51 | 40:19 | 05:44 +00:07 | 39:25 +00:54 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 46:10 | 04:53 +00:03 | 45:09 +01:01 |
| Running 6 | 05:40 | 51:06 | 05:34 +00:06 | 50:02 +01:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 56:46 | 02:16 -00:13 | 55:36 +01:10 |
| Running 7 | 05:41 | 58:49 | 05:33 +00:08 | 57:52 +00:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:55 | 01:04:30 | 05:25 +00:30 | 01:03:25 +01:05 |
| Running 8 | 06:06 | 01:10:25 | 06:15 -00:09 | 01:08:50 +01:35 |
| Wall Balls | 06:27 | 01:16:31 | 06:53 -00:26 | 01:15:05 +01:26 |
| Roxzone | 06:26 | 01:29:17 | 07:19 -00:53 | 01:29:17 |
Analysis of Splits:
- Running 1: Justin's time of 00:04:39 was slightly slower than average by 00:02. He should focus on improving his speed and endurance in this segment.
- Ski Erg: Justin's time of 00:04:28 was also slightly slower than average by 00:01. He can work on increasing his power and efficiency on the Ski Erg.
- Running 2: Justin's time of 00:05:53 was 00:48 slower than average. He should prioritize improving his running speed and endurance in this segment.
- Sled Push: Justin performed well in this segment with a time of 00:02:42, which was 00:39 faster than average.
- Running 3: Justin's time of 00:06:04 was 00:28 slower than average. He should focus on maintaining his speed and endurance in this segment.
- Sled Pull: Justin's time of 00:05:52 was 00:19 slower than average. He can work on improving his strength and technique in this segment.
- Running 4: Justin's time of 00:06:04 was 00:28 slower than average. He should focus on maintaining his speed and endurance in this segment.
- Burpees Broad Jump: Justin performed well in this segment with a time of 00:04:37, which was 00:42 faster than average.
- Running 5: Justin's time of 00:05:51 was 00:07 slower than average. He should work on maintaining his speed and endurance in this segment.
- Rowing: Justin's time of 00:04:56 was 00:07 slower than average. He can focus on improving his power and technique on the rowing machine.
- Running 6: Justin's time of 00:05:40 was 00:05 slower than average. He should work on maintaining his speed and endurance in this segment.
- Farmers Carry: Justin performed well in this segment with a time of 00:02:03, which was 00:17 faster than average.
- Running 7: Justin's time of 00:05:41 was 00:06 slower than average. He should focus on maintaining his speed and endurance in this segment.
- Sandbag Lunges: Justin's time of 00:05:55 was 00:35 slower than average. He should work on improving his strength and endurance in this segment.
- Running 8: Justin's time of 00:06:06 was 00:17 faster than average. He can focus on maintaining his speed and endurance in this segment.
- Wall Balls: Justin performed well in this segment with a time of 00:06:27, which was 00:24 faster than average.
- Roxzone: Justin performed well in this segment with a time of 00:06:26, which was 00:39 faster than average.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kronenburg Sander | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:29:17 | |
| Peters Daniel | 2024 Glasgow | 01:29:08 | |
| Pacetti Matteo | 2024 Turin | 01:29:15 | |
| York Brian | 2023 London | 01:29:03 | |
| Wiese Ben | 2024 Brisbane | 01:29:01 | |
| Parisi Tom | 2024 Dallas | 01:29:01 | |
| Rooney Ian | 2023 Paris | 01:28:47 | |
| Calmon Martin | 2022 Birmingham | 01:29:27 | |
| Southall Zack | 2024 Madrid | 01:29:31 | |
| Vete David | 2024 Stockholm | 01:29:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Birmingham Harper Justin | 01:31:19 | |
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London Harper Justin | 01:31:14 | |
| 2024 Copenhagen Mcnulty Kristian, Harper Justin | 01:06:34 | |
| 2024 Stockholm Mcnulty Kristian, Harper Justin | 01:06:32 | |
| 2024 Stockholm Mcnulty Kristian, Harper Justin, White Barry, Sutherland Dougie | 01:13:29 | |
| 2024 London Kirby Darren, Harper Justin | 01:06:47 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam Mcnulty Kristian, Harper Justin | 01:08:55 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Harper Justin
