Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hadler Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hadler Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hadler Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hadler Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:07 | 07:26 to 06:19 | 37.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:39 | 02:46 to 02:07 | 21.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:32 | 05:21 to 04:49 | 18.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:26 | 03:15 to 02:49 | 14.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 04:35 to 04:26 | 5.1% |
| Rowing | 00:05 | 04:52 to 04:47 | 2.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:56 to 40:56 | 0.0% |
| Hadler Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:27 | 00:00 | 04:41 -00:14 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 04:27 | 04:29 +00:06 | 04:41 -00:14 |
| Running 2 | 04:28 | 09:02 | 05:04 -00:36 | 09:10 -00:08 |
| Sled Push | 03:15 | 13:30 | 02:59 +00:16 | 14:14 -00:44 |
| Running 3 | 05:31 | 16:45 | 05:31 +00:00 | 17:13 -00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 05:21 | 22:16 | 05:05 +00:16 | 22:44 -00:28 |
| Running 4 | 05:09 | 27:37 | 05:29 -00:20 | 27:49 -00:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:49 | 32:46 | 05:33 -00:44 | 33:18 -00:32 |
| Running 5 | 05:16 | 37:35 | 05:41 -00:25 | 38:51 -01:16 |
| Rowing | 04:52 | 42:51 | 04:52 +00:00 | 44:32 -01:41 |
| Running 6 | 05:12 | 47:43 | 05:32 -00:20 | 49:24 -01:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:46 | 52:55 | 02:14 +00:32 | 54:56 -02:01 |
| Running 7 | 05:08 | 55:41 | 05:31 -00:23 | 57:10 -01:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:53 | 01:00:49 | 05:17 -00:24 | 01:02:41 -01:52 |
| Running 8 | 05:50 | 01:05:42 | 06:10 -00:20 | 01:07:58 -02:16 |
| Wall Balls | 07:26 | 01:11:32 | 06:46 +00:40 | 01:14:08 -02:36 |
| Roxzone | 09:06 | 01:27:55 | 07:01 +02:05 | 01:27:55 |
Paul's performance in the running segments was particularly impressive, with his total running time being faster than average. This suggests that he has a strong running profile and should continue to focus on developing his running skills. His best running lap was completed in 00:04:27, which was 00:04 faster than the average.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Paul can further enhance his performance in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Zaun Andreas | 2021 Hamburg | 01:28:12 | |
| Hekking Juriaan | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:28:18 | |
| Hathway Eric | 2023 London | 01:27:42 | |
| Calvin Jay | 2024 Milan | 01:27:27 | |
| Burch Tim | 2024 Sydney | 01:28:17 | |
| Walsh Peter | 2023 Dublin | 01:27:40 | |
| Massey Samuel | 2024 Dubai | 01:28:09 | |
| Mounet Benjamin | 2024 Marseille | 01:27:54 | |
| Appleton Toby | 2024 Manchester | 01:27:49 | |
| Dunsmore Ian | 2024 Manchester | 01:27:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Copenhagen | 01:12:16 | |
| 2024 Malaga | 01:12:16 | |
| 2023 Hamburg | 01:17:05 | |
| 2024 Hamburg | 01:16:40 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
