Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Groeneveld Remco's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Groeneveld Remco's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Groeneveld Remco's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Groeneveld Remco's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:43. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:00 | 05:26 to 04:26 | 21.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:54 | 05:09 to 04:15 | 19.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:52 | 06:22 to 05:30 | 18.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:38 | 05:08 to 04:30 | 13.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:36 | 03:04 to 02:28 | 12.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:34 | 02:28 to 01:54 | 12.0% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 04:42 to 04:36 | 2.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:19 to 04:16 | 1.1% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:07 to 38:07 | 0.0% |
| Groeneveld Remco | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:36 | 00:00 | 04:23 -00:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 03:36 | 04:21 -00:02 | 04:23 -00:47 |
| Running 2 | 04:16 | 07:55 | 04:44 -00:28 | 08:44 -00:49 |
| Sled Push | 03:04 | 12:11 | 02:44 +00:20 | 13:28 -01:17 |
| Running 3 | 05:04 | 15:15 | 05:08 -00:04 | 16:12 -00:57 |
| Sled Pull | 05:09 | 20:19 | 04:36 +00:33 | 21:20 -01:01 |
| Running 4 | 04:52 | 25:28 | 05:06 -00:14 | 25:56 -00:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:08 | 30:20 | 04:55 +00:13 | 31:02 -00:42 |
| Running 5 | 04:45 | 35:28 | 05:15 -00:30 | 35:57 -00:29 |
| Rowing | 04:42 | 40:13 | 04:42 +00:00 | 41:12 -00:59 |
| Running 6 | 05:00 | 44:55 | 05:09 -00:09 | 45:54 -00:59 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:28 | 49:55 | 02:04 +00:24 | 51:03 -01:08 |
| Running 7 | 04:52 | 52:23 | 05:07 -00:15 | 53:07 -00:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:26 | 57:15 | 04:46 +00:40 | 58:14 -00:59 |
| Running 8 | 05:46 | 01:02:41 | 05:36 +00:10 | 01:03:00 -00:19 |
| Wall Balls | 06:22 | 01:08:27 | 05:59 +00:23 | 01:08:36 -00:09 |
| Roxzone | 06:08 | 01:20:49 | 06:14 -00:06 | 01:20:49 |
Remco's best running lap was 00:03:36, which was 00:40 faster than the average. His running performance throughout the race was consistently strong, with most of his running splits being faster than the average.
In summary, Remco Groeneveld had a strong performance in the Hyrox race, with a focus on improving in the Sandbag Lunges, Burpees Broad Jump, Wall Balls, Farmers Carry, and Sled Pull segments. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as targeted exercises, form corrections, and efficient transitions, he can enhance his performance in these areas and further improve his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Chivers Ben | 2024 London | 01:20:57 | |
| Gough Sean | 2021 Birmingham | 01:20:54 | |
| Cendroski Brad | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:21:04 | |
| Maxime Pichard | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:20:50 | |
| Castellaneta Mario | 2023 Köln | 01:20:47 | |
| Rubio Julio | 2023 Houston | 01:20:23 | |
| Calayag Shawn | 2024 Anaheim | 01:20:25 | |
| Woolery Antony | 2024 Malaga | 01:20:23 | |
| Smith Tristan | 2024 Melbourne | 01:21:13 | |
| Mangin Robert | 2019 Hamburg | 01:20:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:13:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
