Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Corbeau Danny's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Corbeau Danny's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Corbeau Danny's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Corbeau Danny's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:38 | 06:26 to 04:48 | 35.0% |
| Run Total | 01:29 | 42:18 to 40:49 | 31.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:30 | 02:29 to 01:59 | 10.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:30 | 06:20 to 05:50 | 10.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:14 | 04:34 to 04:20 | 5.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:13 | 04:53 to 04:40 | 4.6% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 04:45 to 04:41 | 1.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:02 | 04:31 to 04:29 | 0.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Corbeau Danny | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:35 | 00:00 | 04:32 -00:57 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:34 | 03:35 | 04:24 +00:10 | 04:32 -00:57 |
| Running 2 | 04:58 | 08:09 | 04:53 +00:05 | 08:56 -00:47 |
| Sled Push | 01:54 | 13:07 | 02:51 -00:57 | 13:49 -00:42 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 15:01 | 05:17 -00:02 | 16:40 -01:39 |
| Sled Pull | 04:31 | 20:16 | 04:48 -00:17 | 21:57 -01:41 |
| Running 4 | 05:26 | 24:47 | 05:15 +00:11 | 26:45 -01:58 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:26 | 30:13 | 05:06 +01:20 | 32:00 -01:47 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 36:39 | 05:25 +00:16 | 37:06 -00:27 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 42:20 | 04:46 -00:01 | 42:31 -00:11 |
| Running 6 | 05:44 | 47:05 | 05:17 +00:27 | 47:17 -00:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:29 | 52:49 | 02:08 +00:21 | 52:34 +00:15 |
| Running 7 | 05:37 | 55:18 | 05:16 +00:21 | 54:42 +00:36 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:53 | 01:00:55 | 04:56 -00:03 | 59:58 +00:57 |
| Running 8 | 06:05 | 01:05:48 | 05:50 +00:15 | 01:04:54 +00:54 |
| Wall Balls | 06:20 | 01:11:53 | 06:17 +00:03 | 01:10:44 +01:09 |
| Roxzone | 05:31 | 01:23:36 | 06:35 -01:04 | 01:23:36 |
Danny Corbeau delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, securing an overall rank within the top 30% of competitors and a similar standing within his age group. Notably, he demonstrated a strong start, with his Running 1 segment being significantly faster than average, placing him in the 10th percentile. This indicates an aggressive initial pace, which might have contributed to the slower times in later running segments. His overall running time was slightly slower than average by 8 seconds, suggesting a need to enhance running endurance. Danny's performance in strength-based activities like the Sled Push was exceptional, positioning him among the top competitors, indicating a strong profile in strength activities. However, there are opportunities for improvement in both running and certain strength segments, pointing towards a hybrid athlete profile.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sousa Nehemiah | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:23:53 | |
| Norris Elliott | 2024 London | 01:24:03 | |
| Bould Liam | 2023 Birmingham | 01:23:45 | |
| Symondson Greg | 2024 Manchester | 01:23:16 | |
| Callery Dan | 2024 Perth | 01:23:13 | |
| Arcy Robin | 2023 London | 01:23:48 | |
| Martin David | 2023 Glasgow | 01:23:47 | |
| Plater Euan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:23:32 | |
| Slattery Conor | 2024 Madrid | 01:23:58 | |
| Suah Lucas | 2024 Singapore | 01:23:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:33:47 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
