Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 951 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Connolly Daniel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Connolly Daniel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Connolly Daniel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Connolly Daniel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:53 | 08:53 to 07:00 | 29.3% |
| Run Total | 01:48 | 51:53 to 50:05 | 28.0% |
| Wall Balls | 01:17 | 09:44 to 08:27 | 19.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:35 | 07:04 to 06:29 | 9.1% |
| Rowing | 00:25 | 05:38 to 05:13 | 6.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 | 02:56 to 02:40 | 4.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:12 | 03:49 to 03:37 | 3.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Connolly Daniel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:34 | 00:00 | 05:20 -01:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:46 | 03:34 | 04:44 +00:02 | 05:20 -01:46 |
| Running 2 | 06:08 | 08:20 | 05:48 +00:20 | 10:04 -01:44 |
| Sled Push | 03:49 | 14:28 | 03:36 +00:13 | 15:52 -01:24 |
| Running 3 | 06:49 | 18:17 | 06:27 +00:22 | 19:28 -01:11 |
| Sled Pull | 05:05 | 25:06 | 06:18 -01:13 | 25:55 -00:49 |
| Running 4 | 07:04 | 30:11 | 06:28 +00:36 | 32:13 -02:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:53 | 37:15 | 07:11 +01:42 | 38:41 -01:26 |
| Running 5 | 07:43 | 46:08 | 06:44 +00:59 | 45:52 +00:16 |
| Rowing | 05:38 | 53:51 | 05:15 +00:23 | 52:36 +01:15 |
| Running 6 | 07:36 | 59:29 | 06:30 +01:06 | 57:51 +01:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:56 | 01:07:05 | 02:39 +00:17 | 01:04:21 +02:44 |
| Running 7 | 07:31 | 01:10:01 | 06:32 +00:59 | 01:07:00 +03:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:04 | 01:17:32 | 06:39 +00:25 | 01:13:32 +04:00 |
| Running 8 | 05:32 | 01:24:36 | 07:48 -02:16 | 01:20:11 +04:25 |
| Wall Balls | 09:44 | 01:30:08 | 08:46 +00:58 | 01:27:59 +02:09 |
| Roxzone | 06:24 | 01:46:07 | 09:22 -02:58 | 01:46:07 |
Considering the competitive field of 2696 athletes, Daniel Connolly showcased a commendable performance by securing the 1605th position, which places him in the top 59% of the overall participants. In his age group of 35-39, he ranked 373 out of 553 athletes, putting him in the top 67%. His total running time was 51 minutes and 53 seconds, which was merely a second slower than the average time in this category. His best running lap was clocked at 5 minutes 32 seconds.
Based on the analysis of his performance, he appears to have a hybrid profile with a slight leaning towards strength. He started the race significantly faster than average in running 1, but gradually his pace fell below the average in the subsequent running segments. His transition times in the roxzone were quite impressive, being faster than average by 2 minutes and 55 seconds. This suggests he managed his energy efficiently between the exercise zones.
To improve his overall performance, Daniel should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Nuzum Dre | 2021 Austin | 01:46:24 | |
| Zweig Raphael | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:46:11 | |
| Ronge Patrick | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:46:14 | |
| Karall Raphael | 2022 Wien | 01:46:04 | |
| Dieux Wesley | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:46:06 | |
| Rahman Sofian | 2024 Taipei | 01:46:36 | |
| Malazgirt Altay | 2023 Dallas | 01:45:51 | |
| Geny Guillaume | 2023 Paris | 01:45:48 | |
| Hay Matt | 2024 Glasgow | 01:46:36 | |
| Svanqvist Viktor | 2024 Stockholm | 01:46:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
