Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Chadwick Tom's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Chadwick Tom's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Chadwick Tom's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Chadwick Tom's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:57. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:25 | 41:40 to 39:15 | 61.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:45 | 05:12 to 04:27 | 19.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:25 | 02:52 to 02:27 | 10.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:18 | 04:42 to 04:24 | 7.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 01:57 to 01:53 | 1.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:52 to 03:52 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:17 to 05:17 | 0.0% |
| Chadwick Tom | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:43 | 00:00 | 04:23 +01:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 05:43 | 04:21 -00:16 | 04:23 +01:20 |
| Running 2 | 04:58 | 09:48 | 04:44 +00:14 | 08:44 +01:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:52 | 14:46 | 02:44 +00:08 | 13:28 +01:18 |
| Running 3 | 05:03 | 17:38 | 05:07 -00:04 | 16:12 +01:26 |
| Sled Pull | 03:52 | 22:41 | 04:34 -00:42 | 21:19 +01:22 |
| Running 4 | 05:05 | 26:33 | 05:05 +00:00 | 25:53 +00:40 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:12 | 31:38 | 04:54 +00:18 | 30:58 +00:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:13 | 36:50 | 05:15 -00:02 | 35:52 +00:58 |
| Rowing | 04:22 | 42:03 | 04:41 -00:19 | 41:07 +00:56 |
| Running 6 | 05:11 | 46:25 | 05:07 +00:04 | 45:48 +00:37 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:57 | 51:36 | 02:03 -00:06 | 50:55 +00:41 |
| Running 7 | 05:09 | 53:33 | 05:06 +00:03 | 52:58 +00:35 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:42 | 58:42 | 04:44 -00:02 | 58:04 +00:38 |
| Running 8 | 05:22 | 01:03:24 | 05:35 -00:13 | 01:02:48 +00:36 |
| Wall Balls | 05:17 | 01:08:46 | 05:58 -00:41 | 01:08:23 +00:23 |
| Roxzone | 06:35 | 01:20:28 | 06:07 +00:28 | 01:20:28 |
Tom Chadwick has demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox race. He ranked within the top 23% of all athletes and top 28% in his age group of 30-34, proving his competitiveness.
His overall time of 01:20:28 is noteworthy, but his total running time was 01:04 slower than the average, indicating there's room for improvement in this area. His best running lap was 00:04:58. This suggests that he may be more strength-based as compared to his running, which is backed up by his faster than average times in strength-based exercises such as Ski Erg, Sled Pull, Rowing, Farmers Carry, and Wall Balls.
A more detailed look into his splits from Running 1 to Running 4 suggests that he may have started the race a bit slow, as he was 01:21 slower than the average in the first running segment. However, his pacing improved over the subsequent runs.
Tom Chadwick's performance shows potential for improvement in certain areas, specifically:
Based on the analysis, several strategies can be implemented for Tom Chadwick's upcoming races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Palmer Josh | 2024 Melbourne | 01:20:05 | |
| Hirsbrunner Daniel | 2019 Frankfurt | 01:20:32 | |
| Struthers Iain | 2022 London | 01:20:04 | |
| King Declan | 2024 Dublin | 01:20:12 | |
| Johnson Ryan | 2022 Chicago | 01:20:27 | |
| Galligan Conor | 2024 Madrid | 01:19:58 | |
| Griffith Shane | 2024 Dublin | 01:20:03 | |
| Fernandez Salvador Javier | 2024 Madrid | 01:20:31 | |
| Elwell Alexander | 2022 Birmingham | 01:20:04 | |
| Dorlijn Arnoud | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:20:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
