Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cerrillo Nacho's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cerrillo Nacho's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cerrillo Nacho's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cerrillo Nacho's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 01:11 | 04:08 to 02:57 | 34.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:09 | 06:41 to 05:32 | 33.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:44 | 02:56 to 02:12 | 21.1% |
| Rowing | 00:13 | 05:05 to 04:52 | 6.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:09 | 05:24 to 05:15 | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:32 to 04:29 | 1.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:17 to 04:17 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:27 to 06:27 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 42:34 to 42:34 | 0.0% |
| Cerrillo Nacho | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:27 | 00:00 | 04:46 +00:41 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 05:27 | 04:31 +00:01 | 04:46 +00:41 |
| Running 2 | 04:33 | 09:59 | 05:10 -00:37 | 09:17 +00:42 |
| Sled Push | 04:08 | 14:32 | 03:04 +01:04 | 14:27 +00:05 |
| Running 3 | 05:09 | 18:40 | 05:39 -00:30 | 17:31 +01:09 |
| Sled Pull | 04:17 | 23:49 | 05:16 -00:59 | 23:10 +00:39 |
| Running 4 | 05:03 | 28:06 | 05:38 -00:35 | 28:26 -00:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:41 | 33:09 | 05:49 +00:52 | 34:04 -00:55 |
| Running 5 | 05:20 | 39:50 | 05:50 -00:30 | 39:53 -00:03 |
| Rowing | 05:05 | 45:10 | 04:56 +00:09 | 45:43 -00:33 |
| Running 6 | 05:15 | 50:15 | 05:40 -00:25 | 50:39 -00:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:56 | 55:30 | 02:18 +00:38 | 56:19 -00:49 |
| Running 7 | 05:17 | 58:26 | 05:39 -00:22 | 58:37 -00:11 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:24 | 01:03:43 | 05:30 -00:06 | 01:04:16 -00:33 |
| Running 8 | 06:34 | 01:09:07 | 06:22 +00:12 | 01:09:46 -00:39 |
| Wall Balls | 06:27 | 01:15:41 | 07:02 -00:35 | 01:16:08 -00:27 |
| Roxzone | 08:41 | 01:30:42 | 07:32 +01:09 | 01:30:42 |
Nacho Cerrillo showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Madrid Hyrox race, finishing in the top 42% of his age group (40-44) and overall rank. His total running time, which was 2:26 faster than the average, reveals that he has a strong runner profile. However, his Roxzone time, which was 1:13 slower than the average, indicates a need for improvement in his overall fitness and transition time. His pacing in the first four running segments was slower in the first segment but improved markedly in the subsequent segments. This suggests that he might have started out more cautiously, but his endurance and pacing strategy allowed him to finish each running segment faster than average.
There are several segments where Nacho can focus his training to improve his performance:
Here are some strategies Nacho could implement during the race for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mason James | 2022 London | 01:30:16 | |
| Buchbach Markus | 2020 Hannover | 01:30:32 | |
| Gibson Kerr | 2023 Glasgow | 01:30:18 | |
| Orduño López Maximiliano | 2024 Mexico City | 01:30:54 | |
| Gramadies Sebastian | 2023 Stockholm | 01:30:49 | |
| Schlüter Markus | 2018 Hamburg | 01:30:35 | |
| Lor Frédéric | 2024 Paris | 01:30:17 | |
| Dokman Morris | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:30:22 | |
| Wildgrube Marcel | 2018 Hamburg | 01:31:11 | |
| Taylor Jeff | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:30:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
