Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Arensman Dave's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Arensman Dave's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Arensman Dave's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Arensman Dave's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:11 | 42:37 to 39:26 | 57.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:38 | 03:06 to 02:28 | 11.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:37 | 05:07 to 04:30 | 11.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:30 | 04:56 to 04:26 | 9.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:16 | 04:31 to 04:15 | 4.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:31 to 04:16 | 4.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 01:59 to 01:54 | 1.5% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Arensman Dave | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:57 | 00:00 | 04:26 +00:31 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 04:57 | 04:22 +00:09 | 04:26 +00:31 |
| Running 2 | 04:35 | 09:28 | 04:46 -00:11 | 08:48 +00:40 |
| Sled Push | 03:06 | 14:03 | 02:45 +00:21 | 13:34 +00:29 |
| Running 3 | 05:09 | 17:09 | 05:09 +00:00 | 16:19 +00:50 |
| Sled Pull | 04:31 | 22:18 | 04:39 -00:08 | 21:28 +00:50 |
| Running 4 | 04:52 | 26:49 | 05:07 -00:15 | 26:07 +00:42 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:07 | 31:41 | 04:57 +00:10 | 31:14 +00:27 |
| Running 5 | 05:09 | 36:48 | 05:16 -00:07 | 36:11 +00:37 |
| Rowing | 04:27 | 41:57 | 04:42 -00:15 | 41:27 +00:30 |
| Running 6 | 05:18 | 46:24 | 05:09 +00:09 | 46:09 +00:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:59 | 51:42 | 02:04 -00:05 | 51:18 +00:24 |
| Running 7 | 05:23 | 53:41 | 05:08 +00:15 | 53:22 +00:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:56 | 59:04 | 04:48 +00:08 | 58:30 +00:34 |
| Running 8 | 07:18 | 01:04:00 | 05:38 +01:40 | 01:03:18 +00:42 |
| Wall Balls | 05:05 | 01:11:18 | 06:03 -00:58 | 01:08:56 +02:22 |
| Roxzone | 05:03 | 01:21:16 | 06:17 -01:14 | 01:21:16 |
Based on his splits analysis, Dave's overall running time of 00:42:37 was 03:24 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to focus more on improving his running performance. Additionally, his best running lap time of 00:04:35 suggests that he has the potential to improve his speed and efficiency in running.
Overall, Dave Arensman had a strong performance in the 2024 Maastricht Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running performance, addressing the identified areas for improvement, and implementing effective race strategies, he can further enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hearns Ethan | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:21:11 | |
| Otero Manu | 2024 Madrid | 01:21:03 | |
| Rea Corin | 2024 Birmingham | 01:21:39 | |
| García López Alvaro Jesús | 2023 Bilbao | 01:21:16 | |
| Kendrick Chris | 2020 Chicago | 01:21:10 | |
| Mackenzie Calum | 2023 Glasgow | 01:21:29 | |
| Keane Frank | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:21:12 | |
| Bariant Thibault | 2024 Paris | 01:21:37 | |
| Hunter Ross | 2024 Stockholm | 01:21:15 | |
| Finnigan Owen | 2024 Madrid | 01:21:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:20:09 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:14:14 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:39:53 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
