Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Perales John's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Perales John's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Perales John's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Perales John's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 09:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 08:57 | 14:23 to 05:26 | 90.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:30 | 02:52 to 02:22 | 5.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:24 | 07:40 to 07:16 | 4.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:05 to 03:05 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:40 to 03:40 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:53 to 04:53 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:00 to 04:00 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 45:38 to 45:38 | 0.0% |
| Perales John | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:46 | 00:00 | 04:58 -00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 04:46 | 04:36 -00:16 | 04:58 -00:12 |
| Running 2 | 04:56 | 09:06 | 05:23 -00:27 | 09:34 -00:28 |
| Sled Push | 03:05 | 14:02 | 03:13 -00:08 | 14:57 -00:55 |
| Running 3 | 08:07 | 17:07 | 05:52 +02:15 | 18:10 -01:03 |
| Sled Pull | 14:23 | 25:14 | 05:36 +08:47 | 24:02 +01:12 |
| Running 4 | 06:02 | 39:37 | 05:53 +00:09 | 29:38 +09:59 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:40 | 45:39 | 06:19 -02:39 | 35:31 +10:08 |
| Running 5 | 05:40 | 49:19 | 06:07 -00:27 | 41:50 +07:29 |
| Rowing | 04:53 | 54:59 | 05:03 -00:10 | 47:57 +07:02 |
| Running 6 | 05:11 | 59:52 | 05:55 -00:44 | 53:00 +06:52 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:52 | 01:05:03 | 02:27 +00:25 | 58:55 +06:08 |
| Running 7 | 05:18 | 01:07:55 | 05:54 -00:36 | 01:01:22 +06:33 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:00 | 01:13:13 | 05:54 -01:54 | 01:07:16 +05:57 |
| Running 8 | 05:42 | 01:17:13 | 06:48 -01:06 | 01:13:10 +04:03 |
| Wall Balls | 07:40 | 01:22:55 | 07:41 -00:01 | 01:19:58 +02:57 |
| Roxzone | 05:21 | 01:35:48 | 08:09 -02:48 | 01:35:48 |
Pacing and Profile:
Based on the analysis, John's total running time of 00:45:38 indicates that he has a strong running profile. However, his performance in the running segments, particularly Running 1 and Running 3, was slightly slower than average. This suggests that he may benefit from focusing on improving his speed and endurance in running.
In conclusion, John Perales had a solid performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques for the identified areas of improvement, such as the Sled Pull, Running 3, and Farmers Carry segments, he can work towards achieving better results in future races. Additionally, implementing effective race strategies, such as pacing, transition efficiency, and mental preparation, will further contribute to his success.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Noack Michael | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:35:29 | |
| Sanson Chris | 2024 Brisbane | 01:36:02 | |
| Mayr Franz | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:35:56 | |
| Phillips Luis | 2023 London | 01:35:49 | |
| Toh Jimmy | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:36:03 | |
| Beltran Ruben | 2023 Valencia | 01:35:56 | |
| Mehmet Mehmet | 2024 Stockholm | 01:35:39 | |
| Rizzo Gary | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:36:08 | |
| Hilton Mick | 2023 London | 01:35:48 | |
| Meincke Sebastian | 2022 Berlin | 01:36:10 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
