Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tiellemans Rob's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tiellemans Rob's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tiellemans Rob's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tiellemans Rob's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:53 | 52:37 to 47:44 | 86.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:30 | 06:30 to 06:00 | 8.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:08 | 06:35 to 06:27 | 2.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:08 | 07:53 to 07:45 | 2.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:26 to 02:26 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Tiellemans Rob | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:20 | 00:00 | 05:08 -00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 04:20 | 04:40 -00:17 | 05:08 -00:48 |
| Running 2 | 05:59 | 08:43 | 05:36 +00:23 | 09:48 -01:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 14:42 | 03:25 -00:59 | 15:24 -00:42 |
| Running 3 | 06:35 | 17:08 | 06:07 +00:28 | 18:49 -01:41 |
| Sled Pull | 04:31 | 23:43 | 05:53 -01:22 | 24:56 -01:13 |
| Running 4 | 06:43 | 28:14 | 06:05 +00:38 | 30:49 -02:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:35 | 34:57 | 06:37 -00:02 | 36:54 -01:57 |
| Running 5 | 07:12 | 41:32 | 06:21 +00:51 | 43:31 -01:59 |
| Rowing | 04:52 | 48:44 | 05:09 -00:17 | 49:52 -01:08 |
| Running 6 | 06:38 | 53:36 | 06:12 +00:26 | 55:01 -01:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 01:00:14 | 02:33 -00:24 | 01:01:13 -00:59 |
| Running 7 | 06:50 | 01:02:23 | 06:09 +00:41 | 01:03:46 -01:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:30 | 01:09:13 | 06:14 +00:16 | 01:09:55 -00:42 |
| Running 8 | 08:23 | 01:15:43 | 07:09 +01:14 | 01:16:09 -00:26 |
| Wall Balls | 07:53 | 01:24:06 | 08:13 -00:20 | 01:23:18 +00:48 |
| Roxzone | 08:16 | 01:40:08 | 08:37 -00:21 | 01:40:08 |
Rob Tiellemans delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, finishing in the top 57% overall and top 63% in his age group. His overall time was 01:40:08. Rob demonstrated significant strength in power-based exercises such as the sled push and sled pull, indicating a strong proficiency in strength-based tasks. However, the total running time of 00:52:37 was 03:24 slower than the average, suggesting an area of development in running efficiency. Additionally, the early running segments were notably faster, but as the race progressed, his pace decreased, indicating a potential pacing issue.
His performance suggests that he has a hybrid profile, excelling in strength exercises but needing to balance this with improved endurance and pacing strategies.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Caruana JonPaul | 2024 Birmingham | 01:40:27 | |
| Karantzidis JannisParis | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:39:42 | |
| Jamjumrat Natdanai | 2024 Hong Kong | 01:39:44 | |
| Westra Rob | 2024 Glasgow | 01:40:32 | |
| Picker Björn | 2024 Köln | 01:39:51 | |
| Rosam Luke | 2024 Melbourne | 01:40:07 | |
| Tu Adrian | 2023 London | 01:40:33 | |
| Mcphee Philip | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:39:42 | |
| Jones Oliver | 2023 London | 01:40:22 | |
| Huber Christoph | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:40:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
