Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Smith Eric's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Smith Eric's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Smith Eric's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Smith Eric's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:54 | 06:04 to 04:10 | 29.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:35 | 06:44 to 05:09 | 24.4% |
| Sled Pull | 01:22 | 05:22 to 04:00 | 21.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:36 | 02:24 to 01:48 | 9.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:23 | 02:42 to 02:19 | 5.9% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:18 | 04:27 to 04:09 | 4.6% |
| Rowing | 00:16 | 04:47 to 04:31 | 4.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:18 to 04:12 | 1.5% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 34:39 to 34:39 | 0.0% |
| Smith Eric | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:20 | 00:00 | 04:18 -00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 03:20 | 04:19 -00:01 | 04:18 -00:58 |
| Running 2 | 04:18 | 07:38 | 04:35 -00:17 | 08:37 -00:59 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 11:56 | 02:38 +00:04 | 13:12 -01:16 |
| Running 3 | 04:27 | 14:38 | 04:58 -00:31 | 15:50 -01:12 |
| Sled Pull | 05:22 | 19:05 | 04:23 +00:59 | 20:48 -01:43 |
| Running 4 | 04:21 | 24:27 | 04:56 -00:35 | 25:11 -00:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:27 | 28:48 | 04:36 -00:09 | 30:07 -01:19 |
| Running 5 | 04:32 | 33:15 | 05:04 -00:32 | 34:43 -01:28 |
| Rowing | 04:47 | 37:47 | 04:37 +00:10 | 39:47 -02:00 |
| Running 6 | 04:23 | 42:34 | 04:58 -00:35 | 44:24 -01:50 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 46:57 | 01:59 +00:25 | 49:22 -02:25 |
| Running 7 | 04:35 | 49:21 | 04:57 -00:22 | 51:21 -02:00 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:04 | 53:56 | 04:31 +01:33 | 56:18 -02:22 |
| Running 8 | 04:46 | 01:00:00 | 05:24 -00:38 | 01:00:49 -00:49 |
| Wall Balls | 06:44 | 01:04:46 | 05:42 +01:02 | 01:06:13 -01:27 |
| Roxzone | 06:24 | 01:17:47 | 05:52 +00:32 | 01:17:47 |
Eric Smith demonstrated an impressive performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier HYROX race, finishing in the top 12% of all athletes and the top 10% of his age group. This exceptional performance is indicative of his commitment to fitness and his competitive spirit. Eric’s total running time was 4 minutes and 42 seconds faster than the average, suggesting that his running abilities are a significant strength. His pacing was also remarkable, especially in the early stages of the race, where he consistently outpaced the average times. However, his performance suggests a stronger inclination towards running than strength exercises, as evidenced by slower times in exercises like Sandbag Lunges and Wall Balls.
Eric should consider implementing the following strategies during the race for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Boomsma Nils | 2024 Köln | 01:17:18 | |
| Donoghue Mark | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:11 | |
| Kay George | 2024 Perth | 01:17:21 | |
| Vialletel Vincent | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:17:54 | |
| Elrick Kyle | 2023 Glasgow | 01:17:49 | |
| Player Cameron | 2022 Dallas | 01:18:11 | |
| Tindal Mark | 2024 Glasgow | 01:17:31 | |
| Manolis Troy | 2024 Melbourne | 01:17:23 | |
| Quarry Rio | 2024 Manchester | 01:17:45 | |
| Ha Ngoc Dat | 2023 Hamburg | 01:18:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Chicago | 01:37:29 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
