Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Sharkey Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Sharkey Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Sharkey Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Sharkey Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:54 | 07:31 to 05:37 | 39.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:16 | 05:53 to 04:37 | 26.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:46 | 05:17 to 04:31 | 15.8% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 04:55 to 04:38 | 5.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:13 | 04:31 to 04:18 | 4.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:11 | 02:43 to 02:32 | 3.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:09 | 02:05 to 01:56 | 3.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:05 | 04:26 to 04:21 | 1.7% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 37:12 to 37:12 | 0.0% |
| Sharkey Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:46 | 00:00 | 04:29 +00:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 04:46 | 04:23 +00:08 | 04:29 +00:17 |
| Running 2 | 04:03 | 09:17 | 04:48 -00:45 | 08:52 +00:25 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 13:20 | 02:46 -00:03 | 13:40 -00:20 |
| Running 3 | 04:18 | 16:03 | 05:12 -00:54 | 16:26 -00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 04:26 | 20:21 | 04:41 -00:15 | 21:38 -01:17 |
| Running 4 | 04:25 | 24:47 | 05:09 -00:44 | 26:19 -01:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:53 | 29:12 | 04:59 +00:54 | 31:28 -02:16 |
| Running 5 | 04:37 | 35:05 | 05:19 -00:42 | 36:27 -01:22 |
| Rowing | 04:55 | 39:42 | 04:44 +00:11 | 41:46 -02:04 |
| Running 6 | 04:44 | 44:37 | 05:12 -00:28 | 46:30 -01:53 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 49:21 | 02:07 -00:02 | 51:42 -02:21 |
| Running 7 | 04:40 | 51:26 | 05:10 -00:30 | 53:49 -02:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:17 | 56:06 | 04:51 +00:26 | 58:59 -02:53 |
| Running 8 | 05:42 | 01:01:23 | 05:42 +00:00 | 01:03:50 -02:27 |
| Wall Balls | 07:31 | 01:07:05 | 06:09 +01:22 | 01:09:32 -02:27 |
| Roxzone | 07:32 | 01:22:00 | 06:19 +01:13 | 01:22:00 |
Kevin Sharkey put on an impressive performance at the 2024 Birmingham Hyrox, finishing in the top 26% overall and the top 24% in his age group. His total running time was notably fast, beating the average by 04:04, indicating a strong runner profile. However, his performance in the roxzone, where he was slower than average, suggests room for improvement in his overall fitness and transition time. His pacing throughout the race was generally on point, with some segments showing an exceptionally fast pace, especially in the running segments.
Kevin should work on maintaining a steady pace throughout the race, avoiding starting too fast or too slow. He should also focus on his transition times, aiming to switch between exercises as quickly and efficiently as possible. During the race, it would be beneficial for him to focus on his form during the strength segments, as these were his weaker areas. Finally, he should ensure he is staying hydrated and taking on enough fuel during the race to maintain his energy levels.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lythgoe Jason | 2024 Manchester | 01:21:46 | |
| Stubičar Aleš | 2024 Milan | 01:21:39 | |
| Hammerschlag Patrick | 2024 Köln | 01:22:10 | |
| Visser Timothy | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:21:40 | |
| Tynan Fintan | 2024 Dublin | 01:21:52 | |
| Tschirn Ross | 2024 Dallas | 01:21:32 | |
| Calderón Ricardo | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:22:22 | |
| Sunderland Tobias | 2024 Perth | 01:21:37 | |
| Jackson James | 2024 Köln | 01:21:51 | |
| Haas Achim | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:21:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:18:31 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:31:14 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
