Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 München using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Nash George's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Nash George's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Nash George's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Nash George's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:02 | 40:44 to 38:42 | 36.3% |
| Sled Pull | 01:43 | 05:51 to 04:08 | 30.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:52 | 03:16 to 02:24 | 15.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:28 | 04:42 to 04:14 | 8.3% |
| Rowing | 00:24 | 04:58 to 04:34 | 7.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 01:58 to 01:51 | 2.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:52 to 03:52 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:03 to 03:03 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Nash George | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:58 | 00:00 | 04:20 -00:22 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 03:58 | 04:20 +00:22 | 04:20 -00:22 |
| Running 2 | 04:43 | 08:40 | 04:40 +00:03 | 08:40 +00:00 |
| Sled Push | 03:16 | 13:23 | 02:41 +00:35 | 13:20 +00:03 |
| Running 3 | 05:28 | 16:39 | 05:04 +00:24 | 16:01 +00:38 |
| Sled Pull | 05:51 | 22:07 | 04:29 +01:22 | 21:05 +01:02 |
| Running 4 | 05:22 | 27:58 | 05:03 +00:19 | 25:34 +02:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:52 | 33:20 | 04:45 -00:53 | 30:37 +02:43 |
| Running 5 | 05:32 | 37:12 | 05:11 +00:21 | 35:22 +01:50 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 42:44 | 04:40 +00:18 | 40:33 +02:11 |
| Running 6 | 04:58 | 47:42 | 05:04 -00:06 | 45:13 +02:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 52:40 | 02:02 -00:04 | 50:17 +02:23 |
| Running 7 | 05:05 | 54:38 | 05:03 +00:02 | 52:19 +02:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:03 | 59:43 | 04:38 -01:35 | 57:22 +02:21 |
| Running 8 | 05:42 | 01:02:46 | 05:31 +00:11 | 01:02:00 +00:46 |
| Wall Balls | 04:43 | 01:08:28 | 05:49 -01:06 | 01:07:31 +00:57 |
| Roxzone | 06:18 | 01:19:20 | 06:00 +00:18 | 01:19:20 |
However, there are areas where George can focus on to further improve his performance. His total running time of 00:40:44 was 02:03 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to work on his overall fitness and transition time. Additionally, his splits in the Running 3, Sled Pull, Ski Erg, Rowing, Running 5, Running 4, and Sled Push segments were all slower than the average. These segments, along with the Roxzone, contributed to the most time lost during the race.
In conclusion, George Nash had a commendable performance in the 2022 München Hyrox race. While there are areas for improvement, particularly in his running segments, sled pull, ski erg, and transitions, he has shown great potential and determination. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, George can enhance his overall performance and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schweizer Manuel | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:18:51 | |
| Williams Michael | 2023 Chicago | 01:19:37 | |
| TwistGreen Louis | 2024 Glasgow | 01:19:12 | |
| Stamm Martin | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:19:31 | |
| Carter Max | 2024 Brisbane | 01:19:08 | |
| Roberts Aidan | 2024 Manchester | 01:19:17 | |
| Mucher Markus | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:19:18 | |
| Matthews William | 2023 Dublin | 01:19:32 | |
| Digani Nick | 2022 Dallas | 01:19:06 | |
| Vachelard Arthur | 2022 New York | 01:19:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 München | 01:13:35 | |
| 2024 Stuttgart | 01:11:39 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:17:44 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:16:27 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
