Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mulder Ties's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mulder Ties's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mulder Ties's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mulder Ties's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:38 | 50:21 to 43:43 | 94.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:16 | 05:45 to 05:29 | 3.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:06 | 06:42 to 06:36 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:26 to 02:26 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Mulder Ties | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:01 | 00:00 | 04:45 -00:44 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 04:01 | 04:31 -00:03 | 04:45 -00:44 |
| Running 2 | 06:06 | 08:29 | 05:09 +00:57 | 09:16 -00:47 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 14:35 | 03:04 -00:38 | 14:25 +00:10 |
| Running 3 | 06:28 | 17:01 | 05:37 +00:51 | 17:29 -00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 04:01 | 23:29 | 05:15 -01:14 | 23:06 +00:23 |
| Running 4 | 06:40 | 27:30 | 05:37 +01:03 | 28:21 -00:51 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:45 | 34:10 | 05:47 -00:02 | 33:58 +00:12 |
| Running 5 | 06:59 | 39:55 | 05:49 +01:10 | 39:45 +00:10 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 46:54 | 04:56 -00:13 | 45:34 +01:20 |
| Running 6 | 06:33 | 51:37 | 05:39 +00:54 | 50:30 +01:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 58:10 | 02:17 -00:19 | 56:09 +02:01 |
| Running 7 | 06:18 | 01:00:08 | 05:38 +00:40 | 58:26 +01:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:25 | 01:06:26 | 05:30 -01:05 | 01:04:04 +02:22 |
| Running 8 | 07:20 | 01:10:51 | 06:20 +01:00 | 01:09:34 +01:17 |
| Wall Balls | 06:42 | 01:18:11 | 07:00 -00:18 | 01:15:54 +02:17 |
| Roxzone | 05:39 | 01:30:23 | 07:29 -01:50 | 01:30:23 |
Ties Mulder demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race. With an overall rank of 1341 out of 3118 athletes, he positioned himself in the top 43%, showcasing competitive capabilities. Notably, Ties excelled in strength-based exercises, such as the Sled Push and Sled Pull, where he ranked significantly better than average. However, his overall running time was 5:22 slower than the average, indicating that running is an area that needs improvement. His initial running segments were faster than average, suggesting a strong start, but this pace was not maintained, particularly from Running 2 onwards. This indicates a potential pacing issue where he may have started too fast and fatigued later in the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Edwards Jack | 2022 London | 01:30:32 | |
| Harris Matt | 2024 Manchester | 01:30:01 | |
| Plitzko Felix | 2024 Hamburg | 01:30:24 | |
| Hilzinger Hendrik | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:30:44 | |
| Brown Stuart | 2023 London | 01:30:46 | |
| Flink Chris | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:29:59 | |
| Kennedy Thomas | 2024 Glasgow | 01:30:06 | |
| VACCARO ADRIEN | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:30:53 | |
| Jurca Vladpetru | 2023 London | 01:30:24 | |
| Schneider Florian | 2023 München | 01:30:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
