Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Mcdermott Eanna's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Mcdermott Eanna's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Mcdermott Eanna's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Mcdermott Eanna's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:34 | 44:00 to 39:26 | 74.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:55 | 03:23 to 02:28 | 14.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:39 | 04:54 to 04:15 | 10.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:41 to 01:41 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:54 to 04:54 | 0.0% |
| Mcdermott Eanna | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:33 | 00:00 | 04:22 -00:49 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:09 | 03:33 | 04:21 -00:12 | 04:22 -00:49 |
| Running 2 | 06:04 | 07:42 | 04:44 +01:20 | 08:43 -01:01 |
| Sled Push | 03:23 | 13:46 | 02:44 +00:39 | 13:27 +00:19 |
| Running 3 | 06:08 | 17:09 | 05:07 +01:01 | 16:11 +00:58 |
| Sled Pull | 04:54 | 23:17 | 04:34 +00:20 | 21:18 +01:59 |
| Running 4 | 05:56 | 28:11 | 05:06 +00:50 | 25:52 +02:19 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:16 | 34:07 | 04:54 -00:38 | 30:58 +03:09 |
| Running 5 | 06:09 | 38:23 | 05:15 +00:54 | 35:52 +02:31 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 44:32 | 04:41 -00:11 | 41:07 +03:25 |
| Running 6 | 06:07 | 49:02 | 05:08 +00:59 | 45:48 +03:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:41 | 55:09 | 02:04 -00:23 | 50:56 +04:13 |
| Running 7 | 06:01 | 56:50 | 05:07 +00:54 | 53:00 +03:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:15 | 01:02:51 | 04:45 -00:30 | 58:07 +04:44 |
| Running 8 | 04:06 | 01:07:06 | 05:35 -01:29 | 01:02:52 +04:14 |
| Wall Balls | 04:54 | 01:11:12 | 05:58 -01:04 | 01:08:27 +02:45 |
| Roxzone | 04:39 | 01:20:36 | 06:11 -01:32 | 01:20:36 |
First and foremost, congratulations to Eanna Mcdermott for his commendable performance at the 2024 Dublin Hyrox race. He ranked in the top 25% of all athletes and in the top 23% in his age group. This is an impressive achievement, especially considering the competitive field.
However, Eanna's performance indicates a significant area for improvement: his total running time. His overall running time was slower than the average by 03:24. This indicates that Eanna has a strength-dominant profile, performing better in strength-intensive exercises compared to running segments.
Interestingly, Eanna started the race much faster than the average in the first running segment but gradually lost momentum in the subsequent running segments. This suggests that he may have started off too fast, leading to a decrease in efficiency and performance in the later stages of the race.
Maintaining a steady pace from the start of the race is crucial. Eanna started off faster than average but gradually slowed down, which might have affected his overall performance. A more conservative start can help save energy for the later, more demanding stages of the race.
Given that Eanna's strength lies in strength-intensive exercises, he should aim to maximize his performance in these segments while working to improve his running stamina and speed. This hybrid approach can lead to a better overall performance.
Finally, focusing on efficient transitions between different exercises can shave off valuable seconds from the total time. Regular practice of these transitions can make them more seamless and faster.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Flegg Ollie | 2024 London | 01:20:23 | |
| Van Aken Nick | 2022 Maastricht | 01:21:03 | |
| Le Meur Pierre | 2024 Marseille | 01:20:59 | |
| Mitts William | 2023 Anaheim | 01:20:59 | |
| Restancourt Theo | 2024 Milan | 01:20:46 | |
| Hargreaves Gerard | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:22 | |
| Scherzer Christoph | 2023 München | 01:20:14 | |
| Van Den Oever Allard | 2024 Maastricht | 01:20:12 | |
| Brucksch Peter | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:20:19 | |
| Haverkort Niels | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:21:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
