Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Koole Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Koole Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Koole Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Koole Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:18 | 07:42 to 05:24 | 56.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:47 | 07:17 to 06:30 | 19.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:30 | 05:27 to 04:57 | 12.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:21 | 05:30 to 05:09 | 8.5% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:00 to 04:50 | 4.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:28 to 04:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:46 to 02:46 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:27 to 01:27 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:52 to 41:52 | 0.0% |
| Koole Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:54 | 00:00 | 04:47 -00:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:28 | 03:54 | 04:30 -00:02 | 04:47 -00:53 |
| Running 2 | 05:14 | 08:22 | 05:07 +00:07 | 09:17 -00:55 |
| Sled Push | 02:46 | 13:36 | 03:03 -00:17 | 14:24 -00:48 |
| Running 3 | 05:21 | 16:22 | 05:36 -00:15 | 17:27 -01:05 |
| Sled Pull | 05:27 | 21:43 | 05:12 +00:15 | 23:03 -01:20 |
| Running 4 | 05:23 | 27:10 | 05:35 -00:12 | 28:15 -01:05 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:42 | 32:33 | 05:42 +02:00 | 33:50 -01:17 |
| Running 5 | 05:24 | 40:15 | 05:46 -00:22 | 39:32 +00:43 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 45:39 | 04:54 +00:06 | 45:18 +00:21 |
| Running 6 | 05:26 | 50:39 | 05:35 -00:09 | 50:12 +00:27 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:27 | 56:05 | 02:17 -00:50 | 55:47 +00:18 |
| Running 7 | 05:21 | 57:32 | 05:35 -00:14 | 58:04 -00:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:30 | 01:02:53 | 05:26 +00:04 | 01:03:39 -00:46 |
| Running 8 | 05:53 | 01:08:23 | 06:16 -00:23 | 01:09:05 -00:42 |
| Wall Balls | 07:17 | 01:14:16 | 06:55 +00:22 | 01:15:21 -01:05 |
| Roxzone | 08:09 | 01:29:35 | 07:19 +00:50 | 01:29:35 |
Mark Koole delivered a solid performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, finishing in the top 41% overall and top 40% in his age group. His overall time was 01:29:35, showcasing a strong running capability with a total running time of 00:41:52, which is 02:52 faster than the average, indicating a stronger runner profile. Mark excelled in running segments, consistently outperforming the average times, particularly in the initial running segment where he started strong. His fast start in Running 1 suggests he may have paced himself aggressively at the beginning. However, the Roxzone time indicates that Mark could benefit from improving his transition efficiency and overall fitness to maintain his pace throughout the race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rowlands Dafydd | 2024 Manchester | 01:29:35 | |
| Novo Gilles | 2023 Dubai | 01:29:17 | |
| Gardner Philip | 2024 Marseille | 01:29:20 | |
| Weber Florian | 2023 Hannover | 01:29:59 | |
| Torres Andres | 2023 Miami | 01:30:03 | |
| Alashi Ahmad | 2024 Dubai | 01:30:03 | |
| Chandler Michael | 2024 Melbourne | 01:29:29 | |
| Ryan Donncha | 2024 Katowice | 01:29:47 | |
| Price Rob | 2024 Malaga | 01:29:24 | |
| Ho Shun Yuan | 2024 Taipei | 01:29:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:33:39 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:27:53 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:29:55 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
