Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Glorieux Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Glorieux Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Glorieux Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Glorieux Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:13 | 04:34 to 03:21 | 30.5% |
| Run Total | 01:00 | 34:45 to 33:45 | 25.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:37 | 02:31 to 01:54 | 15.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:32 | 04:32 to 04:00 | 13.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:18 | 01:50 to 01:32 | 7.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:10 | 03:26 to 03:16 | 4.2% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 04:26 to 04:17 | 3.8% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:17 to 03:17 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:00 to 04:00 | 0.0% |
| Glorieux Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:34 | 00:00 | 03:55 -00:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 03:34 | 04:10 +00:22 | 03:55 -00:21 |
| Running 2 | 04:13 | 08:06 | 04:11 +00:02 | 08:05 +00:01 |
| Sled Push | 02:31 | 12:19 | 02:25 +00:06 | 12:16 +00:03 |
| Running 3 | 04:38 | 14:50 | 04:26 +00:12 | 14:41 +00:09 |
| Sled Pull | 04:34 | 19:28 | 03:51 +00:43 | 19:07 +00:21 |
| Running 4 | 04:31 | 24:02 | 04:26 +00:05 | 22:58 +01:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:26 | 28:33 | 03:51 -00:25 | 27:24 +01:09 |
| Running 5 | 04:28 | 31:59 | 04:33 -00:05 | 31:15 +00:44 |
| Rowing | 04:26 | 36:27 | 04:25 +00:01 | 35:48 +00:39 |
| Running 6 | 04:18 | 40:53 | 04:28 -00:10 | 40:13 +00:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:50 | 45:11 | 01:46 +00:04 | 44:41 +00:30 |
| Running 7 | 04:18 | 47:01 | 04:28 -00:10 | 46:27 +00:34 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:17 | 51:19 | 03:55 -00:38 | 50:55 +00:24 |
| Running 8 | 04:47 | 54:36 | 04:45 +00:02 | 54:50 -00:14 |
| Wall Balls | 04:00 | 59:23 | 04:53 -00:53 | 59:35 -00:12 |
| Roxzone | 06:00 | 01:09:16 | 04:48 +01:12 | 01:09:16 |
Kevin Glorieux delivered an impressive race at the 2024 Paris Hyrox event. His overall rank of 126 out of 1579 athletes puts him in the top 7% of all competitors, and his rank within his age group of 25-29 is also commendable, placing him in the top 9% of his peers. He finished the race with an overall time of 01:09:16, indicating a good level of fitness and proficiency in both running and strength segments. Kevin's total running time was 00:34:45, which is faster than the average by 00:38. This suggests he has a more runner-focused profile. Interestingly, he started the race strong, with his first run being 00:21 faster than the average. This quick start, coupled with a series of faster-than-average running segments, suggests that Kevin maintained a consistent and aggressive pacing strategy throughout the race. However, it's important to note that his time in the Roxzone was 01:20 slower than the average. This indicates that he took longer to transition between exercise zones, which could be due to fatigue, a need for rest, or inefficiencies in the transition process.
In future races, Kevin should consider a more conservative start to ensure he has enough energy reserves for the entire race. This will be particularly important in managing his energy levels better for the strength segments, where he showed a tendency to perform below average. Kevin should also work on his transition efficiency to minimize his time in the Roxzone. This can be achieved through practicing swift movements from one exercise zone to another during training, and focusing on quicker recovery between high-intensity exercises. Lastly, given Kevin's strong running profile, he should leverage this strength by maintaining his fast pacing in the running segments but work on improving his performance in the strength segments. Incorporating more strength-oriented training in his routine will ensure a more balanced performance, ultimately improving his overall race time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Golab Michal | 2023 Warschau | 01:09:37 | |
| Rowberry Daniel | 2024 Birmingham | 01:09:46 | |
| Jürgens Friedrich | 2023 München | 01:09:31 | |
| Stevens Jack | 2024 Birmingham | 01:09:13 | |
| Strandell Alexander | 2024 Stockholm | 01:09:06 | |
| Rolf Maximilian | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:08:51 | |
| Cush Tom | 2023 Birmingham | 01:09:42 | |
| Salas Perez Jose Maria | 2023 Madrid | 01:09:07 | |
| Van Himbeeck Frederic Pascal | 2023 Köln | 01:09:39 | |
| Clarke Russell | 2024 Manchester | 01:08:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
