Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 790 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Egger Nathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Egger Nathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Egger Nathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Egger Nathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:11 | 52:48 to 51:37 | 62.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:21 | 06:49 to 06:28 | 18.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:16 | 05:06 to 04:50 | 14.2% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 05:22 to 05:19 | 2.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:02 | 07:24 to 07:22 | 1.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:38 to 03:38 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:45 to 02:45 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:29 to 06:29 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 08:50 to 08:50 | 0.0% |
| Egger Nathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:24 | 00:00 | 05:25 -01:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:06 | 04:24 | 04:47 +00:19 | 05:25 -01:01 |
| Running 2 | 06:10 | 09:30 | 05:59 +00:11 | 10:12 -00:42 |
| Sled Push | 03:38 | 15:40 | 03:43 -00:05 | 16:11 -00:31 |
| Running 3 | 07:21 | 19:18 | 06:40 +00:41 | 19:54 -00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 06:49 | 26:39 | 06:31 +00:18 | 26:34 +00:05 |
| Running 4 | 06:54 | 33:28 | 06:41 +00:13 | 33:05 +00:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:24 | 40:22 | 07:30 -00:06 | 39:46 +00:36 |
| Running 5 | 07:17 | 47:46 | 07:00 +00:17 | 47:16 +00:30 |
| Rowing | 05:22 | 55:03 | 05:20 +00:02 | 54:16 +00:47 |
| Running 6 | 06:48 | 01:00:25 | 06:43 +00:05 | 59:36 +00:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:45 | 01:07:13 | 02:49 -00:04 | 01:06:19 +00:54 |
| Running 7 | 06:41 | 01:09:58 | 06:48 -00:07 | 01:09:08 +00:50 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:29 | 01:16:39 | 06:57 -00:28 | 01:15:56 +00:43 |
| Running 8 | 07:17 | 01:23:08 | 08:16 -00:59 | 01:22:53 +00:15 |
| Wall Balls | 08:50 | 01:30:25 | 09:06 -00:16 | 01:31:09 -00:44 |
| Roxzone | 11:05 | 01:50:11 | 09:56 +01:09 | 01:50:11 |
Pacing: Nathan's overall pacing was consistent throughout the race, with no significant variations in his split times. This indicates good race management and the ability to maintain a steady effort level. However, it's worth noting that his total running time was 01:14 slower than the average, suggesting that he may benefit from improving his running speed and efficiency.
Profile: Nathan's best running lap was 00:04:24, which was 00:41 faster than average. This indicates that he has a strong running profile and excels in this aspect of the race. However, to further improve his overall performance, he should focus on his weaker areas, particularly the segments where he lost the most time.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the suggested training techniques and exercises, Nathan can enhance his performance in the identified areas of improvement and continue to progress as a fitness athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Maschek Sven | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:50:34 | |
| Lawrenson Richard | 2023 Manchester | 01:50:35 | |
| Karim Belal | 2019 Hamburg | 01:50:40 | |
| Van Aerde Quincy | 2024 Maastricht | 01:49:57 | |
| Hodges Mark | 2023 London | 01:50:18 | |
| Errandonea Luken | 2024 Marseille | 01:50:21 | |
| Crockford Dan | 2023 London | 01:49:59 | |
| Tan Daryl | 2024 Singapore | 01:50:18 | |
| Zahid Zafran | 2024 Birmingham | 01:49:59 | |
| Rasheed Ahmed | 2024 Dubai | 01:50:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
