Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 994 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Dezelsky Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Dezelsky Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Dezelsky Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Dezelsky Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Push | 02:06 | 05:41 to 03:35 | 42.1% |
| Wall Balls | 01:46 | 10:08 to 08:22 | 35.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:48 | 03:27 to 02:39 | 16.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:11 | 06:18 to 06:07 | 3.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:08 | 06:32 to 06:24 | 2.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:05 to 05:05 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 48:57 to 48:57 | 0.0% |
| Dezelsky Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:24 | 00:00 | 05:18 +00:06 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:44 | 05:24 | 04:43 +00:01 | 05:18 +00:06 |
| Running 2 | 05:32 | 10:08 | 05:47 -00:15 | 10:01 +00:07 |
| Sled Push | 05:41 | 15:40 | 03:34 +02:07 | 15:48 -00:08 |
| Running 3 | 06:13 | 21:21 | 06:24 -00:11 | 19:22 +01:59 |
| Sled Pull | 06:18 | 27:34 | 06:11 +00:07 | 25:46 +01:48 |
| Running 4 | 06:11 | 33:52 | 06:22 -00:11 | 31:57 +01:55 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:35 | 40:03 | 07:05 -01:30 | 38:19 +01:44 |
| Running 5 | 06:10 | 45:38 | 06:39 -00:29 | 45:24 +00:14 |
| Rowing | 05:05 | 51:48 | 05:14 -00:09 | 52:03 -00:15 |
| Running 6 | 06:12 | 56:53 | 06:28 -00:16 | 57:17 -00:24 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:27 | 01:03:05 | 02:37 +00:50 | 01:03:45 -00:40 |
| Running 7 | 06:17 | 01:06:32 | 06:27 -00:10 | 01:06:22 +00:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:32 | 01:12:49 | 06:39 -00:07 | 01:12:49 +00:00 |
| Running 8 | 07:01 | 01:19:21 | 07:37 -00:36 | 01:19:28 -00:07 |
| Wall Balls | 10:08 | 01:26:22 | 08:41 +01:27 | 01:27:05 -00:43 |
| Roxzone | 08:36 | 01:44:59 | 09:13 -00:37 | 01:44:59 |
Based on the splits analysis, Mark's best running lap was 00:05:24, which indicates his potential for speed and endurance. However, he struggled in certain segments, including the Sled Push, Wall Balls, Farmers Carry, and the Running 1 segment.
In conclusion, Mark Dezelsky performed well in the HYROX race in London, but there are areas for improvement. By focusing on specific segments that need improvement, implementing targeted training strategies, and optimizing race strategies, Mark can enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Colombo Lorenzo | 2024 Rimini | 01:45:16 | |
| Burgdorf Nils | 2023 München | 01:44:43 | |
| Quainoo Emmanuel | 2023 Köln | 01:44:51 | |
| Wall James | 2024 London | 01:44:47 | |
| Scholl Sebastian | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:44:57 | |
| Spillman Matthew | 2024 Birmingham | 01:45:29 | |
| Lew Julien | 2024 Taipei | 01:44:49 | |
| Laverty Graham | 2024 Manchester | 01:44:33 | |
| Skeates Steve | 2024 Poznan | 01:44:49 | |
| Conroy Raymond | 2023 Valencia | 01:45:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 London | 01:42:30 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:57:36 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
