Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2020 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Carbray Kevin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Carbray Kevin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Carbray Kevin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Carbray Kevin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:33 | 08:24 to 06:51 | 63.7% |
| Sled Push | 00:27 | 04:00 to 03:33 | 18.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:26 | 06:29 to 06:03 | 17.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:26 to 02:26 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:49 to 05:49 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:08 to 06:08 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 48:28 to 48:28 | 0.0% |
| Carbray Kevin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:33 | 00:00 | 05:17 +00:16 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:43 | 05:33 | 04:43 +00:00 | 05:17 +00:16 |
| Running 2 | 05:27 | 10:16 | 05:46 -00:19 | 10:00 +00:16 |
| Sled Push | 04:00 | 15:43 | 03:29 +00:31 | 15:46 -00:03 |
| Running 3 | 05:47 | 19:43 | 06:21 -00:34 | 19:15 +00:28 |
| Sled Pull | 06:29 | 25:30 | 06:06 +00:23 | 25:36 -00:06 |
| Running 4 | 06:00 | 31:59 | 06:20 -00:20 | 31:42 +00:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:24 | 37:59 | 07:02 +01:22 | 38:02 -00:03 |
| Running 5 | 06:10 | 46:23 | 06:36 -00:26 | 45:04 +01:19 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 52:33 | 05:13 -00:17 | 51:40 +00:53 |
| Running 6 | 06:01 | 57:29 | 06:24 -00:23 | 56:53 +00:36 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:26 | 01:03:30 | 02:36 -00:10 | 01:03:17 +00:13 |
| Running 7 | 06:02 | 01:05:56 | 06:25 -00:23 | 01:05:53 +00:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:49 | 01:11:58 | 06:34 -00:45 | 01:12:18 -00:20 |
| Running 8 | 07:30 | 01:17:47 | 07:33 -00:03 | 01:18:52 -01:05 |
| Wall Balls | 06:08 | 01:25:17 | 08:33 -02:25 | 01:26:25 -01:08 |
| Roxzone | 12:53 | 01:44:11 | 09:13 +03:40 | 01:44:11 |
In terms of his running performance, Carbray completed the total running time in 00:48:28, which was slightly slower than the average time. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his running speed and endurance. His best running lap was 00:05:27, which indicates that he has the potential to improve his speed in shorter running segments.
Overall, Kevin Carbray performed well in the Hyrox race in Chicago. By focusing on improving his running speed and endurance, as well as targeting specific segments for improvement, he can further enhance his performance in future races. Incorporating targeted training strategies and techniques, along with proper race strategies, will help him reach his full potential as a fitness athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hoogerdijk Rutger | 2022 Maastricht | 01:44:17 | |
| Langer Dirk | 2022 Berlin | 01:43:53 | |
| Gonzales Walt | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:44:16 | |
| Spencer Adam | 2024 Glasgow | 01:44:41 | |
| Laird Taylor | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:43:58 | |
| Gobeaut Jérôme | 2024 Marseille | 01:44:06 | |
| Magee Sean | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:44:13 | |
| Mcmullan Rory | 2024 Glasgow | 01:44:25 | |
| Christie Lachlan | 2024 Brisbane | 01:43:57 | |
| Begliomini Daniele | 2024 Turin | 01:43:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:29:43 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
