Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Perth using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Barry Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Barry Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Barry Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Barry Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 00:43. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:13 | 04:54 to 04:41 | 30.2% |
| Wall Balls | 00:13 | 05:55 to 05:42 | 30.2% |
| Run Total | 00:09 | 40:27 to 40:18 | 20.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:04 | 02:38 to 02:34 | 9.3% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:41 to 04:39 | 4.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:02 | 04:37 to 04:35 | 4.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:53 to 01:53 | 0.0% |
| Barry Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:19 | 00:00 | 04:29 +00:50 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 05:19 | 04:24 -00:19 | 04:29 +00:50 |
| Running 2 | 04:31 | 09:24 | 04:51 -00:20 | 08:53 +00:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:38 | 13:55 | 02:49 -00:11 | 13:44 +00:11 |
| Running 3 | 04:50 | 16:33 | 05:14 -00:24 | 16:33 +00:00 |
| Sled Pull | 04:19 | 21:23 | 04:45 -00:26 | 21:47 -00:24 |
| Running 4 | 04:50 | 25:42 | 05:12 -00:22 | 26:32 -00:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:54 | 30:32 | 05:02 -00:08 | 31:44 -01:12 |
| Running 5 | 05:04 | 35:26 | 05:22 -00:18 | 36:46 -01:20 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 40:30 | 04:45 -00:04 | 42:08 -01:38 |
| Running 6 | 04:48 | 45:11 | 05:14 -00:26 | 46:53 -01:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:53 | 49:59 | 02:07 -00:14 | 52:07 -02:08 |
| Running 7 | 05:22 | 51:52 | 05:13 +00:09 | 54:14 -02:22 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:37 | 57:14 | 04:52 -00:15 | 59:27 -02:13 |
| Running 8 | 05:46 | 01:01:51 | 05:43 +00:03 | 01:04:19 -02:28 |
| Wall Balls | 05:55 | 01:07:37 | 06:14 -00:19 | 01:10:02 -02:25 |
| Roxzone | 09:13 | 01:22:38 | 06:22 +02:51 | 01:22:38 |
Nick Barry's performance in the 2024 Perth HYROX race was commendable, achieving an overall rank of 206 out of 688 athletes, placing him in the top 29%. Within his age group (40-44), he ranked 31st out of 100, which is in the top 31%. His overall time was 01:22:38, with a total running time of 00:40:27, which was 01:12 faster than the average, indicating a strong running ability. Notably, his best running lap was 00:04:31, showcasing his potential in running.
However, Nick started relatively slower than average in his first running segment but quickly picked up pace. His running performance suggests a strong hybrid profile, with a slight edge in running over strength-based exercises, although his transition times in the Roxzone indicate room for improvement.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Waller Daniel | 2022 London | 01:22:51 | |
| Harkin John | 2023 Dublin | 01:22:37 | |
| Coccia Valerio | 2024 Rimini | 01:22:08 | |
| Jones Wesley | 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:39 | |
| Keenan Mark | 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:18 | |
| Barascu Radu | 2019 Hamburg | 01:22:30 | |
| Raab Thomas | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:22:26 | |
| Meyer Daniel | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:23:04 | |
| Van Everdink Richard | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:22:15 | |
| Schoumacker Michael | 2024 Paris | 01:22:20 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Melbourne | 01:17:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
