Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Avena Donato's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Avena Donato's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Avena Donato's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Avena Donato's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:46 | 49:13 to 45:27 | 82.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:28 | 06:01 to 05:33 | 10.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:15 | 03:22 to 03:07 | 5.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:24 to 02:19 | 1.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:13 to 04:13 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:00 to 04:00 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:48 to 05:48 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:14 to 06:14 | 0.0% |
| Avena Donato | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:26 | 00:00 | 04:55 -01:29 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:13 | 03:26 | 04:34 -00:21 | 04:55 -01:29 |
| Running 2 | 04:58 | 07:39 | 05:21 -00:23 | 09:29 -01:50 |
| Sled Push | 03:22 | 12:37 | 03:12 +00:10 | 14:50 -02:13 |
| Running 3 | 05:17 | 15:59 | 05:52 -00:35 | 18:02 -02:03 |
| Sled Pull | 04:00 | 21:16 | 05:30 -01:30 | 23:54 -02:38 |
| Running 4 | 10:16 | 25:16 | 05:51 +04:25 | 29:24 -04:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:48 | 35:32 | 06:08 -00:20 | 35:15 +00:17 |
| Running 5 | 04:57 | 41:20 | 06:03 -01:06 | 41:23 -00:03 |
| Rowing | 04:15 | 46:17 | 05:00 -00:45 | 47:26 -01:09 |
| Running 6 | 05:34 | 50:32 | 05:52 -00:18 | 52:26 -01:54 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:24 | 56:06 | 02:24 +00:00 | 58:18 -02:12 |
| Running 7 | 09:27 | 58:30 | 05:52 +03:35 | 01:00:42 -02:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:01 | 01:07:57 | 05:44 +00:17 | 01:06:34 +01:23 |
| Running 8 | 05:21 | 01:13:58 | 06:41 -01:20 | 01:12:18 +01:40 |
| Wall Balls | 06:14 | 01:19:19 | 07:25 -01:11 | 01:18:59 +00:20 |
| Roxzone | 08:56 | 01:34:20 | 07:56 +01:00 | 01:34:20 |
Donato Avena displayed a solid performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event, ranking in the top 37% out of 1,404 athletes. His strengths were clearly evidenced in the ski erg, sled pull, running 1, running 5 and running 8 segments, where he ranked in the top 25 percentile. However, his overall running time was slower than the average by 02:33, indicating a stronger performance in strength exercises compared to running.
In terms of pacing, Donato started the race considerably fast, with his time for running 1 being 01:26 faster than the average. However, he seemed to have lost momentum in the running 4 and running 7 segments, which were notably slower than the average. This suggests that Donato may benefit from a more consistent pacing strategy throughout the race.
For future races, Donato should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lorenzen Patrick | 2018 Hamburg | 01:34:32 | |
| Lo Wing Fai | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:33:51 | |
| Hoge Sander | 2024 Maastricht | 01:34:22 | |
| Diaz Monedero Jose Luis | 2024 Madrid | 01:34:43 | |
| Bhalla Anurag | 2024 Singapore | 01:34:24 | |
| Magalhaes Luiz | 2021 New York | 01:34:34 | |
| Canby Uzzi | 2024 Madrid | 01:34:45 | |
| Yavuz Tuncay | 2019 Essen | 01:34:27 | |
| Valentukonis Povilas | 2024 Malaga | 01:34:08 | |
| Youssef Anthony | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
