Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 London using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 607 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Annecchini Giorgio's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Annecchini Giorgio's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Annecchini Giorgio's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Annecchini Giorgio's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 11:43. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:44 | 11:48 to 07:04 | 40.4% |
| Run Total | 03:06 | 56:09 to 53:03 | 26.5% |
| Wall Balls | 02:52 | 12:12 to 09:20 | 24.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:01 | 08:42 to 07:41 | 8.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:00 to 05:00 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Annecchini Giorgio | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:41 | 00:00 | 05:32 -00:51 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 04:41 | 04:52 -00:38 | 05:32 -00:51 |
| Running 2 | 06:05 | 08:55 | 06:13 -00:08 | 10:24 -01:29 |
| Sled Push | 02:28 | 15:00 | 03:49 -01:21 | 16:37 -01:37 |
| Running 3 | 06:27 | 17:28 | 06:58 -00:31 | 20:26 -02:58 |
| Sled Pull | 05:00 | 23:55 | 06:45 -01:45 | 27:24 -03:29 |
| Running 4 | 06:36 | 28:55 | 06:56 -00:20 | 34:09 -05:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:42 | 35:31 | 07:48 +00:54 | 41:05 -05:34 |
| Running 5 | 07:22 | 44:13 | 07:19 +00:03 | 48:53 -04:40 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 51:35 | 05:25 -00:40 | 56:12 -04:37 |
| Running 6 | 07:13 | 56:20 | 06:59 +00:14 | 01:01:37 -05:17 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 01:03:33 | 02:50 -00:36 | 01:08:36 -05:03 |
| Running 7 | 07:46 | 01:05:47 | 07:02 +00:44 | 01:11:26 -05:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 11:48 | 01:13:33 | 07:21 +04:27 | 01:18:28 -04:55 |
| Running 8 | 10:03 | 01:25:21 | 08:41 +01:22 | 01:25:49 -00:28 |
| Wall Balls | 12:12 | 01:35:24 | 09:32 +02:40 | 01:34:30 +00:54 |
| Roxzone | 06:49 | 01:54:15 | 10:13 -03:24 | 01:54:15 |
In terms of pacing, Annecchini maintained a consistent pace throughout the race, with no significant fluctuations in his splits. This indicates good pacing strategy, as he did not start too fast or fade towards the end.
Based on his splits, Annecchini appears to have a balanced profile, performing well in both the running and strength segments. However, his total running time was 03:54 slower than the average, suggesting there is room for improvement in his running performance.
Additionally, Annecchini should consider incorporating specific training sessions that simulate race conditions, such as practicing transitions between exercises and maintaining a steady heart rate throughout the race. This can help improve his overall performance and reduce time lost during transitions.
Lastly, mental preparation is crucial for success in any race. Annecchini should develop mental strategies to stay focused, motivated, and resilient throughout the race. Visualization techniques, positive self-talk, and setting achievable goals can all contribute to improved race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lee Alan | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:54:40 | |
| Öz Gökhan | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:54:40 | |
| Kalwait Nils | 2023 Hannover | 01:54:37 | |
| Philippe Gousse | 2023 Barcelona | 01:54:30 | |
| Wright Matthew | 2023 Dublin | 01:54:17 | |
| Mori Carlos | 2019 New York | 01:53:55 | |
| Oppermann Sascha | 2023 Hannover | 01:54:34 | |
| Sly William | 2023 Glasgow | 01:54:13 | |
| Castel Elias | 2023 Paris | 01:54:24 | |
| Searle Tom | 2024 Brisbane | 01:54:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 London | 01:36:27 | |
| 2022 London | 02:03:41 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
