Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Weinberger Anika's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Weinberger Anika's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Weinberger Anika's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Weinberger Anika's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 03:53 | 08:02 to 04:09 | 54.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:47 | 06:07 to 04:20 | 25.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:25 | 05:29 to 05:04 | 5.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 | 02:18 to 02:02 | 3.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 05:11 to 04:56 | 3.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:15 | 05:38 to 05:23 | 3.5% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 05:26 to 05:11 | 3.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 38:47 to 38:47 | 0.0% |
| Weinberger Anika | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:57 | 00:00 | 04:59 -00:02 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:11 | 04:57 | 05:02 +00:09 | 04:59 -00:02 |
| Running 2 | 04:45 | 10:08 | 05:19 -00:34 | 10:01 +00:07 |
| Sled Push | 02:05 | 14:53 | 02:36 -00:31 | 15:20 -00:27 |
| Running 3 | 04:46 | 16:58 | 05:35 -00:49 | 17:56 -00:58 |
| Sled Pull | 05:29 | 21:44 | 05:26 +00:03 | 23:31 -01:47 |
| Running 4 | 04:46 | 27:13 | 05:38 -00:52 | 28:57 -01:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:38 | 31:59 | 05:43 -00:05 | 34:35 -02:36 |
| Running 5 | 04:46 | 37:37 | 05:45 -00:59 | 40:18 -02:41 |
| Rowing | 05:26 | 42:23 | 05:18 +00:08 | 46:03 -03:40 |
| Running 6 | 04:49 | 47:49 | 05:39 -00:50 | 51:21 -03:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 52:38 | 02:11 +00:07 | 57:00 -04:22 |
| Running 7 | 04:44 | 54:56 | 05:37 -00:53 | 59:11 -04:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:07 | 59:40 | 04:32 +01:35 | 01:04:48 -05:08 |
| Running 8 | 05:18 | 01:05:47 | 06:00 -00:42 | 01:09:20 -03:33 |
| Wall Balls | 08:02 | 01:11:05 | 04:42 +03:20 | 01:15:20 -04:15 |
| Roxzone | 07:36 | 01:26:33 | 06:31 +01:05 | 01:26:33 |
Anika Weinberger performed impressively, ranking in the top 11% of all athletes, and in the top 9% of her age group. Her overall run time was notably faster than average, indicating a strong runner profile. Anika's pacing throughout the race was remarkable, maintaining a consistent speed that was faster than average in all running segments. However, her performance in strength-based exercises and transitions (roxzone) represented opportunities for improvement.
Anika should continue maintaining her remarkable pace in the running segments, as this is her strength. However, she should also focus on starting her strength-based exercises strong and maintaining a consistent pace throughout. Transition times between exercises are equally important; therefore, practicing swift transitions should be part of her training routine. Additionally, Anika should consider incorporating more recovery time in her training to reduce fatigue during the race. This could be achieved through active recovery exercises such as light jogging or stretching.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lippolt Birgit | 2022 Maastricht | 01:26:45 | |
| Scott Melia Megan | 2024 London | 01:26:28 | |
| Flies Paule | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:26:42 | |
| Hua Carrie | 2024 Madrid | 01:26:29 | |
| Bergius Trælnes Elin | 2024 Stockholm | 01:26:38 | |
| Bielec Kinga | 2024 Katowice | 01:26:43 | |
| Rogers Taylor | 2024 Malaga | 01:26:07 | |
| Klecka Anna | 2024 Stockholm | 01:26:51 | |
| Gans Daniela | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:26:11 | |
| Gericke Lisa | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:26:44 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
