Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Terpstra Paul's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Terpstra Paul's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Terpstra Paul's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Terpstra Paul's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:09. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:09 | 45:08 to 41:59 | 61.2% |
| Wall Balls | 01:19 | 07:27 to 06:08 | 25.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:27 | 05:32 to 05:05 | 8.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:14 | 05:08 to 04:54 | 4.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:15 to 03:15 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Terpstra Paul | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:05 | 00:00 | 04:39 -00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:16 | 04:05 | 04:27 -00:11 | 04:39 -00:34 |
| Running 2 | 05:33 | 08:21 | 05:00 +00:33 | 09:06 -00:45 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 13:54 | 02:56 -00:41 | 14:06 -00:12 |
| Running 3 | 05:40 | 16:09 | 05:26 +00:14 | 17:02 -00:53 |
| Sled Pull | 03:15 | 21:49 | 05:00 -01:45 | 22:28 -00:39 |
| Running 4 | 05:42 | 25:04 | 05:26 +00:16 | 27:28 -02:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:32 | 30:46 | 05:22 +00:10 | 32:54 -02:08 |
| Running 5 | 06:02 | 36:18 | 05:36 +00:26 | 38:16 -01:58 |
| Rowing | 04:38 | 42:20 | 04:50 -00:12 | 43:52 -01:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:57 | 46:58 | 05:28 +00:29 | 48:42 -01:44 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 52:55 | 02:12 -00:12 | 54:10 -01:15 |
| Running 7 | 05:47 | 54:55 | 05:26 +00:21 | 56:22 -01:27 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:08 | 01:00:42 | 05:08 +00:00 | 01:01:48 -01:06 |
| Running 8 | 06:27 | 01:05:50 | 06:04 +00:23 | 01:06:56 -01:06 |
| Wall Balls | 07:27 | 01:12:17 | 06:35 +00:52 | 01:13:00 -00:43 |
| Roxzone | 06:57 | 01:26:32 | 06:57 +00:00 | 01:26:32 |
Paul Terpstra's performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race places him in the top 36% of all athletes, and within the top 24% of his age group. This indicates a solid performance, showcasing competitive strength and endurance. Notably, his total running time of 00:45:08 is slightly slower than the average by 01:37, suggesting a need for improvement in running endurance. Despite this, Paul's strength-based segments, particularly the Sled Push and Sled Pull, are exceptional, indicating a strong affinity for strength over pure running. His initial running segments were faster than average, suggesting a tendency to start strong but potentially pace too aggressively, which may have led to slower times in later run segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Morgan Nick | 2024 Birmingham | 01:26:50 | |
| Staunton Brian | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:26:44 | |
| Kon Yan Tat | 2024 Taipei | 01:27:01 | |
| Dhondt JeanClaude | 2024 Paris | 01:26:58 | |
| Turi Jens | 2024 Köln | 01:27:02 | |
| Wiedemann Leo | 2022 Berlin | 01:26:41 | |
| Smith Neil | 2024 Birmingham | 01:26:52 | |
| Cobelens Simon | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:26:20 | |
| Laureano Enrique | 2023 Chicago | 01:26:59 | |
| Garcia Jaraices Francisco Javier | 2024 Malaga | 01:26:58 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
