Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Incheon using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tang Jon Nathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tang Jon Nathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tang Jon Nathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tang Jon Nathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:58. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:15 | 48:33 to 46:18 | 56.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:53 | 06:21 to 05:28 | 22.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:24 | 06:30 to 06:06 | 10.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:14 | 02:37 to 02:23 | 5.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:12 | 03:24 to 03:12 | 5.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:32 to 05:32 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:34 to 06:34 | 0.0% |
| Tang Jon Nathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:33 | 00:00 | 05:00 +00:33 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 05:33 | 04:37 -00:02 | 05:00 +00:33 |
| Running 2 | 05:08 | 10:08 | 05:25 -00:17 | 09:37 +00:31 |
| Sled Push | 03:24 | 15:16 | 03:15 +00:09 | 15:02 +00:14 |
| Running 3 | 05:51 | 18:40 | 05:59 -00:08 | 18:17 +00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 06:21 | 24:31 | 05:39 +00:42 | 24:16 +00:15 |
| Running 4 | 05:32 | 30:52 | 05:56 -00:24 | 29:55 +00:57 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:30 | 36:24 | 06:21 +00:09 | 35:51 +00:33 |
| Running 5 | 05:53 | 42:54 | 06:10 -00:17 | 42:12 +00:42 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 48:47 | 05:03 -00:18 | 48:22 +00:25 |
| Running 6 | 05:58 | 53:32 | 05:59 -00:01 | 53:25 +00:07 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:37 | 59:30 | 02:26 +00:11 | 59:24 +00:06 |
| Running 7 | 06:07 | 01:02:07 | 05:57 +00:10 | 01:01:50 +00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:32 | 01:08:14 | 05:55 -00:23 | 01:07:47 +00:27 |
| Running 8 | 08:35 | 01:13:46 | 06:51 +01:44 | 01:13:42 +00:04 |
| Wall Balls | 06:34 | 01:22:21 | 07:42 -01:08 | 01:20:33 +01:48 |
| Roxzone | 07:44 | 01:36:30 | 08:15 -00:31 | 01:36:30 |
Jon Nathan Tang delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Incheon Hyrox event, ranking within the top 50% overall and top 46% in his age group. His overall time was 01:36:30, with a total running time slightly slower than average by 00:51, indicating room for improvement in running endurance. Despite this, his running performance showed variability, with some segments significantly faster than average. This suggests a hybrid athletic profile that balances strength and endurance. Notably, Jon started slower than the average in the initial running segments, which might indicate a conservative start strategy or initial pacing issues.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ndunda Anthony | 2023 Dallas | 01:36:24 | |
| Last Mathias | 2024 Malaga | 01:36:19 | |
| Tudor Charles | 2024 London | 01:36:28 | |
| Olver Adam | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:36:20 | |
| Le Comte Boris | 2021 Hamburg | 01:36:00 | |
| Kampschulte Nico | 2019 Essen | 01:36:11 | |
| Barnes Jamie | 2024 New York | 01:36:50 | |
| Sommer Dennis | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:36:25 | |
| Wyatt Aaron | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:36:30 | |
| Ho Nicholas | 2023 Singapore | 01:36:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
