Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Slevin Peter's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Slevin Peter's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Slevin Peter's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Slevin Peter's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:32 | 52:37 to 46:05 | 86.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:39 | 06:05 to 05:26 | 8.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:23 | 03:34 to 03:11 | 5.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:31 to 05:31 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:16 to 02:16 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:16 to 06:16 | 0.0% |
| Slevin Peter | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:03 | 00:00 | 04:58 -01:55 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 03:03 | 04:36 -00:07 | 04:58 -01:55 |
| Running 2 | 06:47 | 07:32 | 05:23 +01:24 | 09:34 -02:02 |
| Sled Push | 03:34 | 14:19 | 03:13 +00:21 | 14:57 -00:38 |
| Running 3 | 07:27 | 17:53 | 05:52 +01:35 | 18:10 -00:17 |
| Sled Pull | 06:05 | 25:20 | 05:33 +00:32 | 24:02 +01:18 |
| Running 4 | 07:16 | 31:25 | 05:53 +01:23 | 29:35 +01:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:31 | 38:41 | 06:18 -00:47 | 35:28 +03:13 |
| Running 5 | 07:26 | 44:12 | 06:07 +01:19 | 41:46 +02:26 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 51:38 | 05:03 -00:04 | 47:53 +03:45 |
| Running 6 | 07:30 | 56:37 | 05:55 +01:35 | 52:56 +03:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 01:04:07 | 02:26 -00:10 | 58:51 +05:16 |
| Running 7 | 07:12 | 01:06:23 | 05:54 +01:18 | 01:01:17 +05:06 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:16 | 01:13:35 | 05:53 -01:37 | 01:07:11 +06:24 |
| Running 8 | 06:00 | 01:17:51 | 06:49 -00:49 | 01:13:04 +04:47 |
| Wall Balls | 06:16 | 01:23:51 | 07:38 -01:22 | 01:19:53 +03:58 |
| Roxzone | 05:39 | 01:35:38 | 08:07 -02:28 | 01:35:38 |
Based on the splits analysis, it can be observed that Peter performed exceptionally well in the Running 1 and Burpees Broad Jump segments, finishing 01:41 and 00:26 faster than the average, respectively. However, he struggled in the Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, and Running 7 segments, finishing slower than the average in each of these segments.
Overall, Peter Slevin has shown great potential and has areas of strength to build upon. By focusing on improving his running endurance, pacing, and transitioning smoothly between segments, he can significantly enhance his overall performance in future HYROX races. Incorporating specific training strategies, exercises, drills, and form corrections tailored to his needs will help him reach his full potential and achieve better results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Griffin Bradley | 2024 Sydney | 01:35:55 | |
| Li Matt | 2024 London | 01:36:08 | |
| Wright Oliver | 2024 Glasgow | 01:35:46 | |
| Naden Charlie | 2024 London | 01:36:05 | |
| Climent Víctor | 2023 Barcelona | 01:35:11 | |
| Martínez Bayona Jorge | 2024 Madrid | 01:35:41 | |
| Wandell Patrik | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:35:16 | |
| López Ricardo | 2024 Paris | 01:35:37 | |
| Kouchi Jeffrey | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:35:11 | |
| Alfirevic Marko | 2024 Glasgow | 01:35:45 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:22:20 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
