Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2018 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Plötz Ole's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Plötz Ole's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Plötz Ole's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Plötz Ole's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:46 | 43:28 to 38:42 | 77.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:21 | 05:39 to 04:18 | 21.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:18 to 04:14 | 1.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:42 to 01:42 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:49 to 03:49 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:31 to 03:31 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:41 to 01:41 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Plötz Ole | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:10 | 00:00 | 04:20 -00:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:18 | 04:10 | 04:20 -00:02 | 04:20 -00:10 |
| Running 2 | 05:03 | 08:28 | 04:41 +00:22 | 08:40 -00:12 |
| Sled Push | 01:42 | 13:31 | 02:42 -01:00 | 13:21 +00:10 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 15:13 | 05:04 +00:19 | 16:03 -00:50 |
| Sled Pull | 03:49 | 20:36 | 04:30 -00:41 | 21:07 -00:31 |
| Running 4 | 05:19 | 24:25 | 05:04 +00:15 | 25:37 -01:12 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:31 | 29:44 | 04:46 -01:15 | 30:41 -00:57 |
| Running 5 | 05:31 | 33:15 | 05:12 +00:19 | 35:27 -02:12 |
| Rowing | 04:25 | 38:46 | 04:40 -00:15 | 40:39 -01:53 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 43:11 | 05:04 +00:18 | 45:19 -02:08 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:41 | 48:33 | 02:01 -00:20 | 50:23 -01:50 |
| Running 7 | 05:34 | 50:14 | 05:03 +00:31 | 52:24 -02:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:39 | 55:48 | 04:38 +01:01 | 57:27 -01:39 |
| Running 8 | 07:09 | 01:01:27 | 05:32 +01:37 | 01:02:05 -00:38 |
| Wall Balls | 04:49 | 01:08:36 | 05:52 -01:03 | 01:07:37 +00:59 |
| Roxzone | 06:08 | 01:19:33 | 06:04 +00:04 | 01:19:33 |
His overall time of 01:19:33 is a solid result, and it is important to note that he performed particularly well in certain segments, such as the Sled Push and Sled Pull, where he was significantly faster than the average time.
However, there are areas of improvement that can be identified based on the splits analysis. Ole Plötz should focus on improving his running performance, as his total running time of 00:43:28 was 04:55 slower than the average. This suggests that he may need to work on his running endurance and speed in order to enhance his overall performance in the race.
Additionally, he should pay attention to his transition time in the roxzone. By improving his overall fitness and working on his transition speed, he can reduce the time spent in this zone and potentially gain an advantage over his competitors.
Overall, Ole Plötz should prioritize improving his running performance through targeted training strategies. By incorporating specific exercises, drills, and training routines tailored to enhance his running endurance and speed, he can make significant improvements in his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jolovic Mladen | 2019 Wien | 01:19:17 | |
| Mcmahon William | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:19:04 | |
| Fischer David | 2022 Bremen | 01:19:59 | |
| Kathage Dirk | 2024 Köln | 01:19:31 | |
| Pleus Stefan | 2023 Hamburg | 01:19:45 | |
| Hindson Douglas | 2022 London | 01:19:13 | |
| Saucke Adrian | 2023 Hamburg | 01:19:09 | |
| Jopillo Angelo | 2022 Dallas | 01:19:52 | |
| Greaves Tyson | 2023 Sydney | 01:19:57 | |
| Marquis Benoit | 2024 Marseille | 01:19:18 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Hamburg | 01:32:41 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
