Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Brisbane using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 233 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Opperman Susan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Opperman Susan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Opperman Susan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Opperman Susan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 11:16. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 08:38 | 01:06:34 to 57:56 | 76.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:25 | 08:13 to 06:48 | 12.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:13 | 10:30 to 09:17 | 10.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:50 to 02:50 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:20 to 06:20 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:34 to 02:34 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Opperman Susan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:53 | 00:00 | 06:12 -01:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:08 | 04:53 | 05:35 -00:27 | 06:12 -01:19 |
| Running 2 | 07:40 | 10:01 | 06:53 +00:47 | 11:47 -01:46 |
| Sled Push | 02:50 | 17:41 | 03:35 -00:45 | 18:40 -00:59 |
| Running 3 | 08:24 | 20:31 | 07:26 +00:58 | 22:15 -01:44 |
| Sled Pull | 06:20 | 28:55 | 07:34 -01:14 | 29:41 -00:46 |
| Running 4 | 08:38 | 35:15 | 07:27 +01:11 | 37:15 -02:00 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:30 | 43:53 | 09:55 +00:35 | 44:42 -00:49 |
| Running 5 | 08:39 | 54:23 | 08:07 +00:32 | 54:37 -00:14 |
| Rowing | 05:15 | 01:03:02 | 06:04 -00:49 | 01:02:44 +00:18 |
| Running 6 | 09:06 | 01:08:17 | 07:41 +01:25 | 01:08:48 -00:31 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:34 | 01:17:23 | 02:49 -00:15 | 01:16:29 +00:54 |
| Running 7 | 09:07 | 01:19:57 | 07:41 +01:26 | 01:19:18 +00:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:13 | 01:29:04 | 07:18 +00:55 | 01:26:59 +02:05 |
| Running 8 | 10:10 | 01:37:17 | 09:01 +01:09 | 01:34:17 +03:00 |
| Wall Balls | 04:44 | 01:47:27 | 07:40 -02:56 | 01:43:18 +04:09 |
| Roxzone | 09:05 | 02:01:07 | 10:09 -01:04 | 02:01:07 |
Susan Opperman delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Brisbane Hyrox event, placing within the top 39% overall and the top 32% in her age group. Her overall time was 02:01:07, with a total running time of 01:06:34, which was 04:31 slower than the average. This indicates a need for improvement in running efficiency. Notably, Susan started the race with a strong pace in the first running segment but slowed significantly in subsequent runs, suggesting she might have started too fast. Her performance in strength-based exercises such as the sled push and wall balls was impressive, indicating a strength-oriented profile. However, she could benefit from enhancing her running stamina and speed to complement her existing strengths.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dankwarth Lea | 2021 Hamburg | 02:01:06 | |
| Mcewan Olivia | 2023 London | 02:00:41 | |
| Kelly Nicola | 2024 Stockholm | 02:01:20 | |
| Rossi Amalia | 2024 Rimini | 02:01:27 | |
| 潘 惠玉 | 2024 Taipei | 02:01:16 | |
| Howard Claire | 2022 Los Angeles | 02:00:44 | |
| Feikes Emily | 2022 Dallas | 02:00:56 | |
| Lomas Amanda | 2024 Manchester | 02:01:15 | |
| Matheson Ceilidh | 2024 Glasgow | 02:01:35 | |
| Mgenge Mary | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 02:00:38 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
