Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Dublin using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Martin Jonathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Martin Jonathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Martin Jonathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Martin Jonathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:42. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:44 | 10:35 to 05:51 | 61.5% |
| Run Total | 02:58 | 48:13 to 45:15 | 38.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:26 to 02:26 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:52 to 01:52 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:25 to 05:25 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:47 to 06:47 | 0.0% |
| Martin Jonathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:32 | 00:00 | 04:53 -01:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:14 | 03:32 | 04:34 -00:20 | 04:53 -01:21 |
| Running 2 | 06:04 | 07:46 | 05:20 +00:44 | 09:27 -01:41 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 13:50 | 03:11 -00:45 | 14:47 -00:57 |
| Running 3 | 06:14 | 16:16 | 05:49 +00:25 | 17:58 -01:42 |
| Sled Pull | 04:25 | 22:30 | 05:29 -01:04 | 23:47 -01:17 |
| Running 4 | 06:29 | 26:55 | 05:49 +00:40 | 29:16 -02:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 10:35 | 33:24 | 06:05 +04:30 | 35:05 -01:41 |
| Running 5 | 06:34 | 43:59 | 06:01 +00:33 | 41:10 +02:49 |
| Rowing | 04:22 | 50:33 | 04:59 -00:37 | 47:11 +03:22 |
| Running 6 | 06:25 | 54:55 | 05:51 +00:34 | 52:10 +02:45 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:52 | 01:01:20 | 02:22 -00:30 | 58:01 +03:19 |
| Running 7 | 06:26 | 01:03:12 | 05:49 +00:37 | 01:00:23 +02:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:25 | 01:09:38 | 05:40 -00:15 | 01:06:12 +03:26 |
| Running 8 | 06:33 | 01:15:03 | 06:38 -00:05 | 01:11:52 +03:11 |
| Wall Balls | 06:47 | 01:21:36 | 07:25 -00:38 | 01:18:30 +03:06 |
| Roxzone | 05:30 | 01:33:44 | 07:49 -02:19 | 01:33:44 |
Jonathan's best running lap was 00:03:32, which was 01:09 faster than average. He also performed well in the Ski Erg segment, completing it in 00:04:14, which was 00:16 faster than average. However, he struggled in certain running segments, such as Running 2, Running 4, Running 7, Running 6, Running 5, and Running 3, where his times were slower than average.
In conclusion, Jonathan Martin had a strong performance in the Hyrox race in Dublin, ranking in the top 35% overall. However, there are areas for improvement, particularly in the Burpees Broad Jump segment and various running segments. By incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as explosive power exercises, interval training, and form correction, Jonathan can enhance his performance in these areas. Additionally, implementing race strategies focused on pacing, transitions, and mental preparation will contribute to his overall improvement in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Darazirar Djilali | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:33:33 | |
| Böcker Christian | 2019 Essen | 01:33:47 | |
| Clarke Toby | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:33:49 | |
| Lau Thomas | 2019 Leipzig | 01:33:17 | |
| Hahn Daniel | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:33:58 | |
| Karp Nick | 2024 Melbourne | 01:33:48 | |
| Chow Chun Pui | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:33:47 | |
| Leong Yeow Lin | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:33:14 | |
| Kitt Dale | 2024 London | 01:33:55 | |
| Shehu Elvis | 2024 Stockholm | 01:34:14 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
