Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
924 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Running
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
Based on 924 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Workouts
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times.
This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
Based on 924 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Pacing Quality
This section showcases the entire Lund Thomas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Lund Thomas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
Based on 924 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Spread of Splits Time
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Lund Thomas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Lund Thomas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
05:14.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 924 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Thomas Lund, a member of the 25-29 age group, demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Hamburg Hyrox race. He ranked in the top 88% of 1247 athletes overall, and in the top 89% in his age group. His total running time was 00:46:29, which was faster than average by 05:42. This indicates Thomas's strength lies in his running ability.
It's noteworthy that Thomas started the race strong, as evidenced by his significantly faster than average time in Running 1. However, his pace fluctuated in the subsequent segments, with some segments slower than average. This suggests that while Thomas has good initial speed, he may benefit from strategies focusing on maintaining a consistent pace throughout the race.
Segments to Improve:
Roxzone: Thomas spent 02:01 more than the average time in the Roxzone. To improve, he could work on his overall fitness and transition times. Introducing high-intensity interval training (HIIT) into his routine could enhance his cardiovascular endurance, and practicing transition drills could decrease his transition times.
Wall Balls: His time was 01:47 slower than the average in this segment. Incorporating more functional training, like kettlebell swings and medicine ball throws, could help him improve his Wall Balls performance.
Ski Erg: Thomas was 01:33 slower than average in this segment. Focused training on the Ski Erg machine could help him gain more efficiency in this area. This could include interval sprints and long endurance sessions.
Farmers Carry: His time was slower than average by 00:38. Grip strength exercises, such as deadlifts and wrist curls, might help improve his performance in this segment.
Sandbag Lunges: Thomas was slower by 00:45 than the average. Incorporating more lunges and squats, particularly weighted ones, into his training routine could enhance his performance in this area.
Race Strategies:
One potential strategy for Thomas would be to focus more on pacing. While his initial speed is impressive, maintaining a steadier pace might prevent him from slowing down in later segments. This could involve setting a goal pace for each segment based on his training times and trying to stick to it during the race.
Given his strong running performance, Thomas might also benefit from a race strategy that capitalizes on this strength. For example, he could aim to gain as much time as possible in the running segments, allowing him more time to complete the strength-based tasks. However, this should be balanced with targeted training to improve his performance in those tasks as well.