Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bravo Allan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bravo Allan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bravo Allan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bravo Allan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:02. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:11 | 50:14 to 45:03 | 85.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 02:38 to 02:17 | 5.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:20 | 05:34 to 05:14 | 5.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:08 | 03:12 to 03:04 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:35 to 04:33 | 0.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:25 to 05:25 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:56 to 04:56 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:48 to 06:48 | 0.0% |
| Bravo Allan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:29 | 00:00 | 04:52 -00:23 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:35 | 04:29 | 04:33 +00:02 | 04:52 -00:23 |
| Running 2 | 05:41 | 09:04 | 05:18 +00:23 | 09:25 -00:21 |
| Sled Push | 03:12 | 14:45 | 03:10 +00:02 | 14:43 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:55 | 17:57 | 05:48 +00:07 | 17:53 +00:04 |
| Sled Pull | 05:34 | 23:52 | 05:27 +00:07 | 23:41 +00:11 |
| Running 4 | 05:57 | 29:26 | 05:48 +00:09 | 29:08 +00:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:25 | 35:23 | 06:04 -00:39 | 34:56 +00:27 |
| Running 5 | 05:59 | 40:48 | 06:00 -00:01 | 41:00 -00:12 |
| Rowing | 04:56 | 46:47 | 04:58 -00:02 | 47:00 -00:13 |
| Running 6 | 05:55 | 51:43 | 05:50 +00:05 | 51:58 -00:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:38 | 57:38 | 02:21 +00:17 | 57:48 -00:10 |
| Running 7 | 06:09 | 01:00:16 | 05:49 +00:20 | 01:00:09 +00:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:55 | 01:06:25 | 05:41 -00:46 | 01:05:58 +00:27 |
| Running 8 | 10:13 | 01:11:20 | 06:37 +03:36 | 01:11:39 -00:19 |
| Wall Balls | 06:48 | 01:21:33 | 07:23 -00:35 | 01:18:16 +03:17 |
| Roxzone | 05:19 | 01:33:32 | 07:53 -02:34 | 01:33:32 |
Looking at his splits, Allan performed particularly well in the Running 1 segment, finishing 00:12 faster than the average time. He also excelled in the Sled Push and Burpees Broad Jump segments, finishing 00:16 and 00:20 faster than average, respectively. Additionally, Allan had a strong performance in the Sandbag Lunges segment, finishing 00:42 faster than average.
However, there are areas for improvement. Allan struggled in the Running 2, Running 7, and Farmers Carry segments, finishing 00:27, 00:22, and 00:13 slower than the average time, respectively. The segment with the most time lost was Running 8, where Allan finished 03:28 slower than average.
In conclusion, Allan Bravo had a solid performance in the Hyrox race, but there are areas for improvement. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, improving transition time, and incorporating strength training exercises, Allan can enhance his performance in the identified segments and improve his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Alford Karl | 2021 London | 01:33:07 | |
| Boyce Jan | 2022 London | 01:33:36 | |
| Gómez José Luis | 2024 Madrid | 01:33:54 | |
| Hogenes Harmen | 2024 Karlsruhe | 01:33:30 | |
| Whistler Mark | 2022 London | 01:33:44 | |
| Bouchane Redouane | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:33:59 | |
| Brabanski Oskar | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:33:35 | |
| Rolff Hans Christian | 2024 Malaga | 01:33:20 | |
| Lee Micky | 2022 Birmingham | 01:33:42 | |
| Enescu Andrei | 2024 Birmingham | 01:33:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 New York | 01:30:32 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
