Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 979 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Der Linden Jim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Der Linden Jim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Der Linden Jim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Der Linden Jim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:20. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:43 | 56:28 to 49:45 | 91.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:19 | 02:58 to 02:39 | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 05:03 to 04:45 | 4.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:31 to 03:31 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 06:03 to 06:03 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:01 to 05:01 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:19 to 05:19 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:15 to 07:15 | 0.0% |
| Van Der Linden Jim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:47 | 00:00 | 05:18 -01:31 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:03 | 03:47 | 04:43 +00:20 | 05:18 -01:31 |
| Running 2 | 07:00 | 08:50 | 05:48 +01:12 | 10:01 -01:11 |
| Sled Push | 03:31 | 15:50 | 03:34 -00:03 | 15:49 +00:01 |
| Running 3 | 09:53 | 19:21 | 06:23 +03:30 | 19:23 -00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 06:03 | 29:14 | 06:11 -00:08 | 25:46 +03:28 |
| Running 4 | 07:15 | 35:17 | 06:22 +00:53 | 31:57 +03:20 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:47 | 42:32 | 07:05 -02:18 | 38:19 +04:13 |
| Running 5 | 07:11 | 47:19 | 06:38 +00:33 | 45:24 +01:55 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 54:30 | 05:14 -00:13 | 52:02 +02:28 |
| Running 6 | 06:32 | 59:31 | 06:27 +00:05 | 57:16 +02:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:58 | 01:06:03 | 02:37 +00:21 | 01:03:43 +02:20 |
| Running 7 | 06:35 | 01:09:01 | 06:27 +00:08 | 01:06:20 +02:41 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:19 | 01:15:36 | 06:37 -01:18 | 01:12:47 +02:49 |
| Running 8 | 08:20 | 01:20:55 | 07:36 +00:44 | 01:19:24 +01:31 |
| Wall Balls | 07:15 | 01:29:15 | 08:42 -01:27 | 01:27:00 +02:15 |
| Roxzone | 08:33 | 01:44:53 | 09:11 -00:38 | 01:44:53 |
Jim's total running time of 00:56:28 is 08:03 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to improve his overall fitness and transition time to decrease the time spent in the Roxzone. Additionally, his running splits show that he is faster than average in Running 1 and Burpees Broad Jump, but slower than average in Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, and Running 8. This suggests that he may need to focus more on his running training to improve his overall running performance.
In conclusion, Jim Van Der Linden performed well in the Hyrox race in Amsterdam but has areas for improvement. By focusing on specific training strategies, such as improving running performance, enhancing transition efficiency, and incorporating targeted exercises, he can enhance his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hyett Joshua | 2023 London | 01:44:42 | |
| Halliday Samuel | 2023 Stockholm | 01:45:11 | |
| Walker Adam | 2024 Manchester | 01:44:39 | |
| Prins Auke | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:44:52 | |
| Johns Michael R | 2023 New York | 01:45:04 | |
| Bruno Joshua | 2021 New York | 01:44:29 | |
| Locke Simon | 2023 London | 01:44:48 | |
| Diedrich Waldemar | 2023 Köln | 01:44:28 | |
| Cloves Lucas | 2024 Madrid | 01:45:21 | |
| Jackson Sam | 2024 Melbourne | 01:45:15 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
