Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Maastricht European Championships using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 808 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Keizer Renske's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Keizer Renske's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Keizer Renske's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Keizer Renske's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:42 | 54:59 to 50:17 | 80.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:19 | 05:38 to 05:19 | 5.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:19 | 02:45 to 02:26 | 5.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:11 | 03:13 to 03:02 | 3.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:11 | 05:38 to 05:27 | 3.1% |
| Rowing | 00:09 | 05:46 to 05:37 | 2.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:48 to 05:48 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:54 to 06:54 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:18 to 04:18 | 0.0% |
| Keizer Renske | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:32 | 00:00 | 05:35 +00:57 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:38 | 06:32 | 05:21 +00:17 | 05:35 +00:57 |
| Running 2 | 06:12 | 12:10 | 06:03 +00:09 | 10:56 +01:14 |
| Sled Push | 03:13 | 18:22 | 03:05 +00:08 | 16:59 +01:23 |
| Running 3 | 06:46 | 21:35 | 06:22 +00:24 | 20:04 +01:31 |
| Sled Pull | 05:48 | 28:21 | 06:36 -00:48 | 26:26 +01:55 |
| Running 4 | 06:43 | 34:09 | 06:26 +00:17 | 33:02 +01:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:54 | 40:52 | 07:20 -00:26 | 39:28 +01:24 |
| Running 5 | 07:16 | 47:46 | 06:37 +00:39 | 46:48 +00:58 |
| Rowing | 05:46 | 55:02 | 05:40 +00:06 | 53:25 +01:37 |
| Running 6 | 06:48 | 01:00:48 | 06:29 +00:19 | 59:05 +01:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:45 | 01:07:36 | 02:30 +00:15 | 01:05:34 +02:02 |
| Running 7 | 06:51 | 01:10:21 | 06:28 +00:23 | 01:08:04 +02:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:38 | 01:17:12 | 05:37 +00:01 | 01:14:32 +02:40 |
| Running 8 | 07:55 | 01:22:50 | 07:08 +00:47 | 01:20:09 +02:41 |
| Wall Balls | 04:18 | 01:30:45 | 05:58 -01:40 | 01:27:17 +03:28 |
| Roxzone | 06:37 | 01:41:31 | 08:16 -01:39 | 01:41:31 |
However, there are areas for improvement that can help Renske enhance her performance and achieve even better results. A closer look at her splits reveals some areas where she lost time compared to the average for her finish time.
Pacing Analysis:
Renske's overall running time of 54 minutes and 59 seconds was 5 minutes and 15 seconds slower than the average. This indicates that she may have paced herself too conservatively throughout the race. To improve her overall performance, she should consider starting the race at a slightly faster pace and maintaining it consistently.
Segment Analysis:
1. Running 1: Renske's time of 6 minutes and 32 seconds was 1 minute and 15 seconds slower than the average. To improve this segment, she should focus on improving her running speed and endurance. Incorporating interval training, such as tempo runs and fartlek runs, can help her increase her running speed.
2. Best Lap: Renske's time of 6 minutes and 12 seconds was solid and close to the average. To maintain this performance, she should continue to focus on her overall fitness and running technique.
3. Running 5: Renske's time of 7 minutes and 16 seconds was 41 seconds slower than the average. To improve this segment, she should work on her endurance and pacing. Incorporating longer distance runs into her training routine can help her build endurance and improve her pacing during the race.
4. Running 8: Renske's time of 7 minutes and 55 seconds was 38 seconds slower than the average. Similar to Running 5, she should focus on her endurance and pacing. Incorporating hill training and interval training can help her improve her running speed and endurance.
5. Running 7, 6, 3, 4, and 2: Renske's times in these segments were all slightly slower than the average. To improve her performance in these running segments, she should focus on her overall running fitness and technique. Incorporating strength training exercises that target the muscles used in running, such as lunges, squats, and plyometric exercises, can help her improve her running speed and efficiency.
6. Ski Erg: Renske's time of 5 minutes and 38 seconds was 19 seconds slower than the average. To improve this segment, she should focus on developing her upper body and core strength. Incorporating exercises such as rows, pull-ups, and planks can help her improve her performance on the Ski Erg.
In conclusion, Renske Keizer had a strong performance in the HYROX race at the 2023 Maastricht European Championships. By focusing on improving her running speed and endurance, as well as her overall fitness and pacing, she can further enhance her performance in future races. Incorporating specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, hill training, and strength exercises, will help her address the areas of improvement identified in this report.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Victoria | 2023 Köln | 01:41:03 | |
| Casey Hannah | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:41:36 | |
| Highton Ellie | 2023 London | 01:41:13 | |
| West Sheila | 2022 Dallas | 01:41:29 | |
| Eichten Lindsay | 2024 Dallas | 01:41:07 | |
| Perez Kelly | 2024 Dallas | 01:41:33 | |
| Šarić Mirela | 2024 Rimini | 01:41:12 | |
| Pethick Janine | 2023 London | 01:41:27 | |
| Stitou Fatima | 2024 Maastricht | 01:41:45 | |
| Motta Lara | 2023 Milan | 01:41:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:42:26 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:34:23 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
