Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Inskip Warren's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Inskip Warren's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Inskip Warren's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Inskip Warren's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:46 | 09:44 to 06:58 | 60.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:20 | 07:08 to 05:48 | 29.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:15 | 05:43 to 05:28 | 5.5% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 05:04 to 04:56 | 2.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:04 | 05:18 to 05:14 | 1.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:56 to 02:56 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:38 to 01:38 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:59 to 41:59 | 0.0% |
| Inskip Warren | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:57 | 00:00 | 04:52 +00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 04:57 | 04:33 -00:09 | 04:52 +00:05 |
| Running 2 | 04:39 | 09:21 | 05:19 -00:40 | 09:25 -00:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:56 | 14:00 | 03:09 -00:13 | 14:44 -00:44 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 16:56 | 05:47 -00:32 | 17:53 -00:57 |
| Sled Pull | 05:18 | 22:11 | 05:25 -00:07 | 23:40 -01:29 |
| Running 4 | 05:09 | 27:29 | 05:48 -00:39 | 29:05 -01:36 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:08 | 32:38 | 06:02 +01:06 | 34:53 -02:15 |
| Running 5 | 05:23 | 39:46 | 06:00 -00:37 | 40:55 -01:09 |
| Rowing | 05:04 | 45:09 | 04:58 +00:06 | 46:55 -01:46 |
| Running 6 | 05:12 | 50:13 | 05:50 -00:38 | 51:53 -01:40 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:38 | 55:25 | 02:21 -00:43 | 57:43 -02:18 |
| Running 7 | 05:03 | 57:03 | 05:48 -00:45 | 01:00:04 -03:01 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:43 | 01:02:06 | 05:38 +00:05 | 01:05:52 -03:46 |
| Running 8 | 06:25 | 01:07:49 | 06:36 -00:11 | 01:11:30 -03:41 |
| Wall Balls | 09:44 | 01:14:14 | 07:20 +02:24 | 01:18:06 -03:52 |
| Roxzone | 09:27 | 01:33:15 | 07:49 +01:38 | 01:33:15 |
Warren Inskip, competing in the 45-49 age group, showcased an impressive performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX, especially considering his overall ranking in the top 57% out of 3261 athletes. Most notably, his total running time was 04:17 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. This strength is further emphasized by consistently faster than average times in all running segments.
Warren's performance in the initial running segments suggests a well-paced start, as his time was slightly slower than average in the first segment, but significantly faster in the subsequent ones. This indicates a thoughtful and strategic approach, preventing burnout early in the race.
Given Warren's strong running profile, he should focus on maintaining a consistent pace throughout the running segments to conserve energy for the strength-based exercises. For the strength segments, focusing on proper form and technique can help to prevent exhaustion and injury. Finally, incorporating more active recovery during the Roxzone can help to improve transition times and overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Bird Andrew | 2024 London | 01:32:55 | |
| Hahne Philip | 2020 Hannover | 01:33:33 | |
| Bosch Marien | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:33:44 | |
| Steindel Victor | 2024 Hamburg | 01:33:39 | |
| Hansen Judge | 2024 Houston | 01:33:36 | |
| Gunia Marek | 2024 Gdansk | 01:33:19 | |
| Cheong Alwyn | 2024 Singapore | 01:33:40 | |
| Ferreira Cristiano | 2022 Valencia | 01:33:14 | |
| Yesil Taylan | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:33:33 | |
| Fleming Danny | 2024 Melbourne | 01:32:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:25:18 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
