Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Feingold Ric's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Feingold Ric's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Feingold Ric's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Feingold Ric's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:28. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:26 | 05:48 to 04:22 | 41.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:38 | 04:50 to 04:12 | 18.3% |
| Run Total | 00:35 | 39:39 to 39:04 | 16.8% |
| Rowing | 00:26 | 05:01 to 04:35 | 12.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:17 | 04:42 to 04:25 | 8.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:03 | 02:29 to 02:26 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:17 to 04:15 | 1.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:01 | 05:26 to 05:25 | 0.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:36 to 01:36 | 0.0% |
| Feingold Ric | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:43 | 00:00 | 04:21 -00:38 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:17 | 03:43 | 04:21 -00:04 | 04:21 -00:38 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 08:00 | 04:42 +00:18 | 08:42 -00:42 |
| Sled Push | 02:29 | 13:00 | 02:43 -00:14 | 13:24 -00:24 |
| Running 3 | 05:07 | 15:29 | 05:05 +00:02 | 16:07 -00:38 |
| Sled Pull | 04:50 | 20:36 | 04:32 +00:18 | 21:12 -00:36 |
| Running 4 | 05:10 | 25:26 | 05:05 +00:05 | 25:44 -00:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:42 | 30:36 | 04:47 -00:05 | 30:49 -00:13 |
| Running 5 | 05:16 | 35:18 | 05:13 +00:03 | 35:36 -00:18 |
| Rowing | 05:01 | 40:34 | 04:40 +00:21 | 40:49 -00:15 |
| Running 6 | 05:08 | 45:35 | 05:05 +00:03 | 45:29 +00:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:36 | 50:43 | 02:02 -00:26 | 50:34 +00:09 |
| Running 7 | 05:04 | 52:19 | 05:04 +00:00 | 52:36 -00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:48 | 57:23 | 04:40 +01:08 | 57:40 -00:17 |
| Running 8 | 05:14 | 01:03:11 | 05:33 -00:19 | 01:02:20 +00:51 |
| Wall Balls | 05:26 | 01:08:25 | 05:54 -00:28 | 01:07:53 +00:32 |
| Roxzone | 06:07 | 01:19:52 | 06:05 +00:02 | 01:19:52 |
Ric Feingold delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Manchester HYROX race, finishing in the top half of all participants and his age group. His overall time was 01:19:52, with a total running time of 00:39:39. This is 39 seconds faster than average, indicating a relatively stronger running profile. This is further evidenced by his best running lap of 00:05:00.
His start in the race was notably strong, with his Running 1 time being 39 seconds faster than average, placing him in the top 19% of runners. However, as the race progressed, his pace slowed slightly, with some running segments falling marginally below the average. Nevertheless, Ric managed to maintain a consistent pace throughout, suggesting a well-paced strategy without burning out too quickly.
The areas where Ric could focus on for improvement are Sandbag Lunges, Roxzone, Sled Pull, and Rowing, as these segments were performed slower than the average.
Moving forward, Ric should consider implementing the following strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rawls Ben | 2022 Essen | 01:19:24 | |
| Eisenhauer Philipp | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:20:01 | |
| Pedersen Simon | 2024 Stockholm | 01:20:19 | |
| Meijer Joep | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:19:37 | |
| Robinson Lee | 2024 Malaga | 01:19:45 | |
| Folger Andrew | 2023 Chicago | 01:19:27 | |
| Chavez Ruben | 2023 Dallas | 01:19:34 | |
| Fermin Antonio | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:19:30 | |
| Diaz Manuel | 2023 New York | 01:20:22 | |
| Latorre Matthew | 2021 London | 01:19:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
