Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cubley Nathan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cubley Nathan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cubley Nathan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cubley Nathan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:38 | 06:23 to 04:45 | 35.9% |
| Sled Push | 01:17 | 04:04 to 02:47 | 28.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:50 | 02:55 to 02:05 | 18.3% |
| Run Total | 00:48 | 43:07 to 42:19 | 17.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:42 to 05:42 | 0.0% |
| Cubley Nathan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:07 | 00:00 | 04:43 -01:36 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 03:07 | 04:28 -00:08 | 04:43 -01:36 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 07:27 | 05:01 +00:06 | 09:11 -01:44 |
| Sled Push | 04:04 | 12:34 | 02:57 +01:07 | 14:12 -01:38 |
| Running 3 | 05:15 | 16:38 | 05:27 -00:12 | 17:09 -00:31 |
| Sled Pull | 06:23 | 21:53 | 05:02 +01:21 | 22:36 -00:43 |
| Running 4 | 05:32 | 28:16 | 05:27 +00:05 | 27:38 +00:38 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:55 | 33:48 | 05:24 -00:29 | 33:05 +00:43 |
| Running 5 | 05:24 | 38:43 | 05:37 -00:13 | 38:29 +00:14 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 44:07 | 04:52 -00:06 | 44:06 +00:01 |
| Running 6 | 05:14 | 48:53 | 05:30 -00:16 | 48:58 -00:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:55 | 54:07 | 02:13 +00:42 | 54:28 -00:21 |
| Running 7 | 07:43 | 57:02 | 05:28 +02:15 | 56:41 +00:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:21 | 01:04:45 | 05:11 -00:50 | 01:02:09 +02:36 |
| Running 8 | 05:47 | 01:09:06 | 06:07 -00:20 | 01:07:20 +01:46 |
| Wall Balls | 05:42 | 01:14:53 | 06:37 -00:55 | 01:13:27 +01:26 |
| Roxzone | 06:38 | 01:27:06 | 07:02 -00:24 | 01:27:06 |
In terms of pacing, Nathan showed good consistency throughout the race. His splits were generally close to the average, with a few segments where he performed slightly better or worse. This indicates that he maintained a steady effort level and avoided significant variations in his performance.
Based on the analysis of his splits, Nathan has a balanced profile with no clear dominance in either running or strength segments. However, his total running time of 00:43:07 was 01:24 slower than the average, suggesting that he could benefit from focusing more on his running abilities.
In conclusion, Nathan Cubley has performed well in the HYROX race, but there are areas where he can make improvements. By focusing on specific training strategies to enhance his running performance and addressing the identified segments for improvement, Nathan can further enhance his overall performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| De Groot Mike | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:26:50 | |
| Walsh Peter | 2023 Glasgow | 01:26:59 | |
| Wilson Ross | 2024 Birmingham | 01:27:13 | |
| Herschell Brendan | 2023 Glasgow | 01:27:04 | |
| Notenboom Maarten | 2023 Köln | 01:27:22 | |
| Craven Jayton | 2023 Melbourne | 01:26:50 | |
| Dominguez Fabian | 2023 Malmö | 01:27:09 | |
| Irwin Neil | 2024 Maastricht | 01:26:43 | |
| Dienes Dominik | 2024 Hamburg | 01:26:53 | |
| Maldonado Antonio | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:26:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
