Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cox Justin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cox Justin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cox Justin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cox Justin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:26. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:18 | 05:30 to 04:12 | 37.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:42 | 05:54 to 05:12 | 20.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:30 | 02:18 to 01:48 | 14.6% |
| Rowing | 00:25 | 04:57 to 04:32 | 12.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:12 | 02:32 to 02:20 | 5.8% |
| Run Total | 00:08 | 38:15 to 38:07 | 3.9% |
| Sled Pull | 00:07 | 04:09 to 04:02 | 3.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:04 | 04:16 to 04:12 | 1.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Cox Justin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:20 | 00:00 | 04:18 -00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 03:20 | 04:19 -00:08 | 04:18 -00:58 |
| Running 2 | 04:47 | 07:31 | 04:37 +00:10 | 08:37 -01:06 |
| Sled Push | 02:32 | 12:18 | 02:39 -00:07 | 13:14 -00:56 |
| Running 3 | 05:00 | 14:50 | 04:59 +00:01 | 15:53 -01:03 |
| Sled Pull | 04:09 | 19:50 | 04:25 -00:16 | 20:52 -01:02 |
| Running 4 | 04:58 | 23:59 | 04:58 +00:00 | 25:17 -01:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:16 | 28:57 | 04:36 -00:20 | 30:15 -01:18 |
| Running 5 | 05:09 | 33:13 | 05:06 +00:03 | 34:51 -01:38 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 38:22 | 04:38 +00:19 | 39:57 -01:35 |
| Running 6 | 05:04 | 43:19 | 04:59 +00:05 | 44:35 -01:16 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:18 | 48:23 | 02:00 +00:18 | 49:34 -01:11 |
| Running 7 | 04:58 | 50:41 | 04:58 +00:00 | 51:34 -00:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:30 | 55:39 | 04:32 +00:58 | 56:32 -00:53 |
| Running 8 | 05:04 | 01:01:09 | 05:26 -00:22 | 01:01:04 +00:05 |
| Wall Balls | 05:54 | 01:06:13 | 05:42 +00:12 | 01:06:30 -00:17 |
| Roxzone | 06:07 | 01:18:06 | 05:54 +00:13 | 01:18:06 |
Justin Cox showcased a strong performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event, ranking in the top 13% of all athletes and top 17% within his age group. Remarkably, Justin's total running time was 01:17 faster than the average, indicating his superior abilities as a runner. He began the race at a swift pace, with his first running split being 00:55 faster than the average. This quick start did not seem to negatively impact his performance in the subsequent exercise zones, suggesting good pacing and energy management. However, his slower time in the Roxzone indicates room for improvement in fitness levels and transition speed. Justin appears to have a runner profile, therefore to achieve a more balanced performance, he should focus on strength training.
To improve future performances, Justin should consider implementing the following race strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Berti Alexander | 2023 München | 01:18:16 | |
| Jonczyk Sebastian | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:17:57 | |
| Sichirollo Enrico | 2023 Milan | 01:18:00 | |
| Banwell Guy | 2024 London | 01:18:05 | |
| Dratschmidt Nicolas | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:18:30 | |
| Trehern Paul | 2019 New York | 01:18:11 | |
| Tsalafoutas Vangelis | 2024 Marseille | 01:18:06 | |
| Chan Eric | 2024 Taipei | 01:17:43 | |
| Vandeberg Robbert | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:18:13 | |
| Van Dyk Daniel | 2024 Dubai | 01:17:56 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
