Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Bantleman Jamie's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Bantleman Jamie's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Bantleman Jamie's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Bantleman Jamie's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:32. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Farmers Carry | 00:55 | 02:49 to 01:54 | 25.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:52 | 05:18 to 04:26 | 24.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:45 | 06:15 to 05:30 | 21.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:41 | 04:56 to 04:15 | 19.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:14 | 02:42 to 02:28 | 6.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:21 to 04:16 | 2.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:16 to 04:16 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:26 to 39:26 | 0.0% |
| Bantleman Jamie | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:11 | 00:00 | 04:24 +00:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 05:11 | 04:22 -00:01 | 04:24 +00:47 |
| Running 2 | 04:30 | 09:32 | 04:45 -00:15 | 08:46 +00:46 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 14:02 | 02:44 -00:02 | 13:31 +00:31 |
| Running 3 | 04:41 | 16:44 | 05:08 -00:27 | 16:15 +00:29 |
| Sled Pull | 04:56 | 21:25 | 04:36 +00:20 | 21:23 +00:02 |
| Running 4 | 04:53 | 26:21 | 05:07 -00:14 | 25:59 +00:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:16 | 31:14 | 04:57 -00:41 | 31:06 +00:08 |
| Running 5 | 05:00 | 35:30 | 05:16 -00:16 | 36:03 -00:33 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 40:30 | 04:41 -00:11 | 41:19 -00:49 |
| Running 6 | 04:59 | 45:00 | 05:09 -00:10 | 46:00 -01:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:49 | 49:59 | 02:04 +00:45 | 51:09 -01:10 |
| Running 7 | 05:05 | 52:48 | 05:07 -00:02 | 53:13 -00:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:18 | 57:53 | 04:46 +00:32 | 58:20 -00:27 |
| Running 8 | 05:10 | 01:03:11 | 05:36 -00:26 | 01:03:06 +00:05 |
| Wall Balls | 06:15 | 01:08:21 | 06:01 +00:14 | 01:08:42 -00:21 |
| Roxzone | 06:29 | 01:20:59 | 06:16 +00:13 | 01:20:59 |
Jamie Bantleman demonstrated a strong performance. His overall ranking puts him in the top 24% of all athletes and top 30% in his age group - an impressive achievement. Remarkably, Jamie's total running time was 01:22 faster than the average, with his best lap recorded at 00:04:30. This suggests that Jamie's strength lies in his running ability. However, at the start of the race, Jamie's pace was slower than average, with his Running 1 time at 00:48 slower than the average. As the race progressed, Jamie managed to improve his pace and consistently record times faster than the average.
Based on the analysis, Jamie should consider the following strategies for better performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Jaroszewicz Krzysztof | 2024 Stockholm | 01:20:54 | |
| Hill Andy | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:21:18 | |
| Abromeit Tim | 2019 Hamburg | 01:21:16 | |
| Ang Kenneth | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:20:35 | |
| Chamorro Morales Emilio Jose | 2023 Malaga | 01:20:51 | |
| Boyal Parvin | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:32 | |
| Laurent Alexis | 2024 Köln | 01:21:27 | |
| Hita Reguera David | 2024 Madrid | 01:20:31 | |
| Otto Florian | 2022 Leipzig | 01:21:07 | |
| Räpple Ron | 2021 Stuttgart | 01:20:31 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:29:29 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
